Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:phase change (Score 1) 295

For comparison, it's almost easier to boil water than to melt it from 0C ice to 0C water.

* 334kJ/kg for water to melt it

* 418kJ/kg for water to raise from 0C to 100C

Let's re-evaluate your statement with the key information that you omitted in your post: * 334kJ/kg for water to melt it * 418kJ/kg for water to raise from 0C to 100C * 2257 J/g is the heat of vaporization of water

You'll notice that the heat of vaporization is an order of magnitude larger than your other metrics. Thus, it is much much harder to boil water than to melt it!

Oh really? Well, isn't it odd that for the first time in history a denier forgets to mention increased water vapor in the atmosphere?

Comment Re:So.. (Score 1) 208

With this revelation will the government allow phone use now?

Here's another way of asking that question:

With this revelation will the government support me putting a 17-year old idiot behind bars for killing a loved one of mine with distracted driving?

With the prevalence of cell phones today (for those counting, that would be ALL drivers on the road) and the average persons ignorance (it'll never happen to me), a deadly accident isn't a matter of if, it's a matter of when.

Isn't it a question of "How many more?" already?

Intel

Where Intel Processors Fail At Math (Again) 239

rastos1 writes: In a recent blog, software developer Bruce Dawson pointed out some issues with the way the FSIN instruction is described in the "Intel® 64 and IA-32 Architectures Software Developer's Manual," noting that the result of FSIN can be very inaccurate in some cases, if compared to the exact mathematical value of the sine function.

Dawson says, "I was shocked when I discovered this. Both the fsin instruction and Intel's documentation are hugely inaccurate, and the inaccurate documentation has led to poor decisions being made. ... Intel has known for years that these instructions are not as accurate as promised. They are now making updates to their documentation. Updating the instruction is not a realistic option."

Intel processors have had a problem with math in the past, too.

Comment Re:Pretty sure Apple already has access (Score 1) 146

Funny how many of the hacked celebs had Android devices, eh? Prove that Google is easily hackable. Funny how most of the hijacked iCloud accounts had the same credentials as their Google accounts - easy passwords even a moron like you could come up with. Not to mention that even mentions that the accounts where likely hacked by password recovery to an already hacked email account - most certainly Gmail. And coincidently, you do sound like a crazed, teenaged Miley Cyrus fan, so why don't you tell us how you did it, instead of just pretending you have a clue?

Comment Re:how I do it (Score 1) 146

Here's how I do it: http://osxdaily.com/2014/02/16...

Timtowtdi of course

Yeah, finding a way that doesn't require the user to turn on Automatic App Download and you having full access to the Apple-ID account (not to mention the user not noticing the new icon with a blue dot before the name) sure would be better than this one.

Comment Re:Tech Companies have become warring fiefdoms (Score 1) 161

Can't innovate man. The tech is covered by patents.

You're not allowed to build your own Siri from scratch.

Give me a break, "they do what they do in India Russia and China because it's the right thing to do."

They follow the law over there while trying to make a buck, same as we do here.

Don't blame our people for obeying the law.

So your only examples of "can't innovate" you could think off was doing something already existing "from scratch"? Something that others have done, supposedly better, as we are constantly told here?

Comment Re:Ridiculous sentence (Score 1) 135

http://news.cnet.com/2100-1027...:

April 28, 2003 12:16 PM PDT
Apple unveils music store
...
The songs cost 99 cents each to download, with no subscription fee, and include the most liberal copying rights of any online service to date. Jobs has been an outspoken opponent of so-called digital rights management (DRM) in the past, arguing that limitations on digital music will undermine the market for legitimate content.

Comment Re: Apple did us a favor (Score 1) 135

Apple finally had to support non DRM industry compatability to stay alive.

Apple supported DRM free music before any of the other stores sold DRM free music from the major labels.

Steve Jobs wrote "Thoughts on Music" where he publicly asked the labels to let Apple and all of the other companies sell DRM free music instead of licensing FairPlay (what the industry wanted) months before music stores start selling DRM free music.

I'm not sure if this is true...IIRC I started buying music from Amazon because it's music did not carry DRM while Apple's still did.

D'uh. Amazon paid the music industry major studios so Amazon (and not Apple or anybody else) could sell DRM free music exclusively for a couple of months. Apart from EMI of course, which allowed Apple to sell their music DRM free before Amazon Music even started as a beta.

Anybody claiming Apple didn't want DRM free music is thus proven wrong. Period. The fact that the Majors delayed Apple's sale of their music DRM free was actually to spite them because they forced the change.

Comment Re: This is typical of the "Jobs era" Apple (Score 1) 135

That was my point. It made sense back in 2001, but not any more. In fact they need a fast ARM chip just to decrypt the iTunes database now, and the encryption serves no purpose other than blocking interoperability.

Translation: Booh-Hooh, Apple keeps backwards compatibility instead of throwing everything over board!

Why don't you stick to that the next time discussing anything regarding Apple , okay?

Comment Re:This is typical of the "Jobs era" Apple (Score 1) 135

I have a PMP that you load music onto like an external hard drive. It also has an internal database that it keeps updated, so that it's used in the same manner as the ipod. (Philips GoGear Vibe, so it's not a pricey one by any stretch).

When you've finished changing the files you just unplug from the PC, the device automatically takes about 15 seconds to scan the files on it and rebuild its database, and that's it.

It also supports MTP.

I had an older Sandisk model that ran of a AAA cell about 9 years ago that operated in the same way. You never had to navigate the filesystem to play media - it was just there to make syncs easier.

Wow, just 7 years after the iPod came out, MPs are able to run a SQLite database - I guess if Apple would just have waited 6 years, they could have done that instead of wasting their time with the iPod.

Comment Re:This is typical of the "Jobs era" Apple (Score 2) 135

Playlists don't, and never have, copied files or required sole access to them. All of the common playlist formats are basically just text files with a list of filenames - you can open & edit them in Notepad!

So they break when somebody moves or renames the files. Wasn't the whole point being able to "manage your files" - which then breaks things?

Microsoft

Samsung Paid Microsoft $1 Billion Last Year In Android Royalties 93

An anonymous reader writes: According to recently unsealed court filings, Samsung Electronics paid Microsoft more than $1 billion in annual fees to use patented Microsoft technology in Samsung's Android phones. The patent treasures include methods for displaying multiple windows in a Web browser. "Samsung originally signed its patent deal with Microsoft in 2011, ahead of its impressive dominance of Android shipments, but late last year Samsung decided it was tired of paying on time, or paying interest when a late payment was finally made. Microsoft has taken Samsung to court over the issues, and the Korean company insists it wants to walk away from the original deal because of Microsoft’s purchase of Nokia’s phone business. Samsung claims the acquisition invalidates the cross-licensing IP agreement, but Microsoft doesnt agree and wants the company to pay $6.9 million in unpaid interest from last year."

Comment Re: Why isn't this auto-update? (Score 1) 174

There will be. Unfortunately, those who would take over our computers do not share our lack of imagination.

The question is: will those case already be fixed by the existing "fast" patches? At least the first patch (that everybody but Apple rushed out) was nothing but duct tape over the big visible hole. It certainly didn't fix the underlying problem.

Slashdot Top Deals

"Gravitation cannot be held responsible for people falling in love." -- Albert Einstein

Working...