Journal Journal: 1k words 34
I think this more or less captures matters:
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2014-07-13/picturing-march-tyranny
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2014-07-13/picturing-march-tyranny
Comment Re:What? (Score 3, Insightful) 753
At the cost of anonymity for those who want to frequent such establishments without so much log file trail.
And there are plenty of other use-cases for people wanting their name decoupled from their deeds.
Not all of them are exactly bad, either.
And there are plenty of other use-cases for people wanting their name decoupled from their deeds.
Not all of them are exactly bad, either.
Comment At least (Score 1) 4
At least it didn't cause global warming
Comment Re:What's the point? (Score 3, Insightful) 129
I mean, really: Emacs looks great in character mode and 80 columns. Why all this other faffing about?
Comment We could jam in Joe's Garage (Score 1) 2
. . .his momma was screamin', his dad was mad. . .
Comment Re:Haven't done T-SQL in years (Score 1) 11
Precisely. In lazy evaluation, (and Haskell is the poster child for this) a value is only acquired when needed. So if you write SQL that lets the server off the hook for one fetch, while still adhering to the letter of the law, then (if this theory is true) that's what's happening.
Comment Re:Betteridge answers (Score 1) 381
++no
Comment Re:Haven't done T-SQL in years (Score 1) 11
Again, invoking a subquery is going to let the database engine know: "OK, get all that stuff first, and THEN work on the rest of the query."
If he simple function call is giving you a more lazy evaluation evaluation, that might explain what's occurring.
If he simple function call is giving you a more lazy evaluation evaluation, that might explain what's occurring.
Comment Haven't done T-SQL in years (Score 1) 11
Is there a threat (even a theoretical one) of the server going into an infinite loop based upon what you're doing?
It may be that the database engine requires the subquery to break the possibility of a cycle in the code, and sequence the computation.
It may be that the database engine requires the subquery to break the possibility of a cycle in the code, and sequence the computation.
Comment Re:Kudos? (Score 1) 8
Take a couple pilz and call me in the morning.
Journal Journal: These secular priests just keep slicing on the drive 30
It's almost as though we should just quit privileging these guys, or something:
This scientific journal just had to retract 60 papers. How does that even happen?
This scientific journal just had to retract 60 papers. How does that even happen?
Comment Re:Kudos? (Score 1) 8
Eternal Champignon?
Comment Re:Kudos? (Score 1) 8
If that was him that mod bombed me on your JE, JC, then I'll just go mod him up for spite.
Comment Re:Wow (Score 1, Flamebait) 5
Just had boy #2 a month ago. Life is good.
