Comment Re:Clever? Yeah, right. (Score 1) 68
why did it fizzle out?
I think it's too early to say that it did. Scholar has 10.5k hits for articles from this year alone...
why did it fizzle out?
I think it's too early to say that it did. Scholar has 10.5k hits for articles from this year alone...
I'm not sure I really follow your argument
Well the other services (except for email, obviously) are largely run by volunteers and don't even have ads (spam notwithstanding).
Quality in the things that are not important to contributors, but are important to many of the people who do not contribute? Not so high.
Now I'm not sure that I follow. Sure, there's lots of stuff that lacks the polish of countless missing man-hours, but we've all come a really long way since the 80s/90s. I'm sure we'll get there if we don't fuck up before that.
I've also seen lots of examples of features that were unimportant to the contributors, but since there was an itch to scratch e.g. in getting recognition from their users, a similar level of rigor was applied to satisfy them.
(Certainly, there's lots of negative examples too, but the point stands, that there was little "physical" value that some devs received for their work and yet still the projects thrive(d). I was, of course, assuming that you meant money when you said "paying for things" in your original post.)
[...] the current Big Data and Machine Learning techniques [...] trump the whole categorization and knowledge extraction / data mining process [...]
Could you please explain, how a statistical approximation can trump an exact model? I think that big data & co. is a step in the right direction with the means that we currently have available and that we'll get there eventually. There's too many benefits that would result from doing it properly to neglect the required effort.
But, please, don't give me a blinking and whirling semantic web whereby every move of the mouse updates your AHDH-laden site.
FTFY. The semantic web is a vision that has little to do with what you described:
According to the W3C, "The Semantic Web provides a common framework that allows data to be shared and reused across application, enterprise, and community boundaries".[2] The term was coined by Tim Berners-Lee for a web of data that can be processed by machines.[3] While its critics have questioned its feasibility, proponents argue that applications in industry, biology and human sciences research have already proven the validity of the original concept.[4]
(From the related Wikipedia article.)
It's our fault.
It's Eternal September all the way down.
Where people are in the habit of paying for things, the providers of those things worry about quality.
Bullshit. The Internet was a fine place before youtube and google and continues to be so now. It just became more convenient, for everyone. Including the parasites.
Go look at other segments of the Internet: email, ftp, irc, jabber, torrents... dominated by quality-oriented mentality!
Look at linux (the systemd debacle notwithstanding;) ), BSD, the open source community in general... Sure, a lot is paid for, but even more is driven by enthusiasm first and foremost.
have had just about enough of it
Who cares?
Fortunately, these days Germans don't have an army capable of attacking anyone, unless it's with broomsticks. So they'd have to live with it.
The oil markets will not accept local currencies; it has to be dollars or in some cases, euros.
You're forgetting Rubles, which is a serious oversight currently.
Also, Greeks do have their own oil, if they start drilling. They have their own electricity too. It'd be difficult, but possible.
They need to start working with the plan that was made for them to clear up the mess and other nations will help them.
Wrong. I wouldn't work with a plan that forces me to cut my own legs (sell state-owned, important infrastructure to the likes of Telekom, Vattenfall, etc.) either, instead I'd look for a proper way out (grow - not shrink).
Living on Earth may be expensive, but it includes an annual free trip around the Sun.