Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:hoooray (Score 2) 75

What affects the 1%ers today will affect the 99%ers tomorrow. This was true for Electric Light and phones in cars, and will be true for imortality.

What about trickle down economics? While it has surely affected the 99-percenters, it was hardly in a positive way. Not everything that benefits the wealthy makes its way to the common person.

Trickle-Down Economics (n)
1. A (repeatedly) failed economic policy (sometimes referred to as Supply-Side) which posits that increasing wealth at the top of the socioeconomic ladder will increase wealth at all socioeconomic levels, i.e., the wealth will "trickle down" and raise everyone up.;
2. A poorly constructed lie stating that giving more to those who have the most will somehow make those with less (or nothing) better off;
3. Pissing on the poor;

Comment Re:Why VPN? (Score 1) 238

That's awesome! I think my 386 came with a really large 40MB drive and I wanted so badly get a CDROM until I found out you still needed drive space to run the games on them. I only remember because that was really when I started to get into computers on my own. I was quite a hardware geek back in those days. I bought that p166 back in 1996 I think, and it was a really expensive rig looking at hardware nowadays.

Yeah. The leaps in performance and capacity have been so huge. I remember back in the late 80s (before IDE/ATA) how awesome it was to get an 80MB (RLL format vs 40MB MFM) disk for my PC XT. Ahh, the joys of INT13 calls under DOS 3.3 :)

Comment Re:Why VPN? (Score 1) 238

Except a PIII-100 did not exist. at 100mhz you would have been talking about a 486dx4 or a Pentium 100mhz machine. PIII ran from 450mhz-1.4ghz IIRC. However, if you are talking about bus speed, then yes, P3 did use a 100mhz-133mhz bus speed. However, when talking about a P3 (or even Pentium 1), a 200mb hard drive would have been tiny. When I bought my Pentium 166mhz machine it came with a (pricey) 4.3gb scsi drive. I believe I even had a 500MB drive hooked up to my 386. And I sure did not have 96MB of RAM, more like 4MB. Those were the days, just not quite like how you remember them...

You're right. I was incorrect. It's a Pentium Pro-200, not a PIII-100. And it's not about *remembering* It's right here, under my desk. Purchased new (Dell Dimension XPS) in 1995, IIRC.
$ cat cpuinfo
processor : 0
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 1
model name : Pentium Pro
stepping : 9
cpu MHz : 199.434

$ cat /proc/meminfo
total: used: free: shared: buffers: cached:
Mem: 96964608 94928896 2035712 0 3387392 13291520

Is there anything else I'm not "remembering" from way back then, Huck?

Submission + - Lessons learned teaching software development (jmoses.co)

John Moses writes: I wanted to watch a tech talk from Pycon 2014 that happened in April of 2014. I scanned the topics to find one that was a little more advanced than an ‘Intro to Django’ and something that could hold my attention in the middle of a Friday. I found one called Sofware Carpentry: Lessons Learned by Greg Wilson.

Comment Re:Separate hardware from software (Score 1) 421

You mean we can't have a check-box on the PC vendor's web page where we configure our device, which lists several operating systems?

You can. But people will freak out when that checkbox would say "Linux + $80". They would think "But Linux is free". While it is a free OS, the OEM wouldn't get subsidies from bloatware providers which help subsidies the cost of the computer.

But folks don't even have that choice. Where we are now is a product of many years under the restrictive MS OEM licenses, and a whole, bottom feeding ecosystem has developed to exploit it. That has done a great deal, IMHO, to limit the innovation and development of alternative OSes, both free and commercial. What is more, in the absence of the predatory MS OEM licensing, as time went by, those self-same bloatware vendors would subsidize other OS' as well.

Comment Re:Dubious. I'm not convinced this is a good thing (Score 1) 421

That is a different issue. I agree it is not good that Microsoft is allowed to create predatory OEM licensing agreements. I would be in favor of regulations that would prevent MS from making such contracts.

But it's not a different issue, IMHO. In the absence of such OEM licensing agreements, vendors could have provided entree for a variety of alternative OS' (including some which were never developed because of the MS OEM lock-in),

Submission + - CERN Tests First Artificial Retina Capable Of Looking For High Energy Particles

KentuckyFC writes: Pattern recognition is one of the few areas where humans regularly outperform even the most powerful computers. Our extraordinary ability is a result of the way our bodies process visual information. But surprisingly, our brains only do part of the work. The most basic pattern recognition—edge detection, line detection and the detection of certain shapes—is performed by the complex circuitry of neurons in the retina. Now particle physicists are copying this trick to hunt for new particles. A team at CERN has built and tested an artificial retina capable of identifying particle tracks in the debris from particle collisions. And it can do it at the same rate that the LHC smashes particles together, about 800 million collisions per second. In other words, it can sift through the data in real time. The team says the retina outperforms any other particle-detecting device by a factor of 400.

Comment Re:Why VPN? (Score 1) 238

Do you regularly remote in to your home network? Do you connect out to a server somewhere? If not, then setting up a VPN isn’t going to give you much (well technically it won’t give you anything). If so, your specific use case (which was not provided) matters.

As for software, one of:

- Throw your linux on there (I like Gentoo hardened) and roll your own with OpenVPN and other assorted tools (I like shorewall as an iptables frontend). - pfSense if you’ve got a decent box and want bells and/or whistles - m0n0wall if you want something light but functional

You might also want to consider routerboard, it’s cool shit and reasonably priced.

I agree. I've been running a similar set up on a PIII-100 (remember those?) with 96MB RAM and a 200MB disk for almost twenty years. The most important part is hardening the kernel, stripping out unneeded software and having a sane set of IPTables rules. Works like a champ!

Comment Re:The geek never learns. (Score 1) 421

If it worked, it worked. If it didn't, it went back to the store. The buyer wasn't obliged to diagnose hardware and software conflicts or borked system installs --- or pay for the privilege of having these problems solved for him

And in the absence of Microsoft's rip-off OEM licensing agreement (pay for each unit you sell, regardless of installed OS), PC vendors would have invested in alternative OS builds and support, obviating that issue. Had this been done years ago, we'd have a much more competitive OS market, rather than what we have now.

Comment Re:Dubious. I'm not convinced this is a good thing (Score 1) 421

Linux, BSD, other open source solutions are awesome, and if I am a hardware vendor I am going to build hardware that supports it because it's awesome. Not because I've been strong armed into it by a the courts. Likewise, I don't want to have to sell Windows because I've been strong-armed into it via Microsoft's predatory OEM licensing agreements

There. FTFY.

Comment Re:Difference between ruling and Judges comments.. (Score 1) 421

Here is my question, if the Free Software Foundation and the open source guys believe so much in having free software on PCs, why not start up a company that only sells PCs and Laptops with free software installed? Why is it the established vendors problem to solve? Begin by launching a fund raising campaign on Kickstarter, find a hardware supplier on Alibaba, and open a web storefront. It's not that hard...

A href="http://www.lmgtfy.com/?q=linux+pc+vendor">Here you go.

Let's try that again. Here you go.

Comment Re:Difference between ruling and Judges comments.. (Score 1) 421

Here is my question, if the Free Software Foundation and the open source guys believe so much in having free software on PCs, why not start up a company that only sells PCs and Laptops with free software installed? Why is it the established vendors problem to solve? Begin by launching a fund raising campaign on Kickstarter, find a hardware supplier on Alibaba, and open a web storefront. It's not that hard...

A href="http://www.lmgtfy.com/?q=linux+pc+vendor">Here you go.

Comment Re:How much would the rebate be? (Score 1) 421

So practically speaking, unless you hate MS with a passion, it is in your own interested to get the basically free version of Windows, do a wipe and reinstall, and go on with your life, as pretty much every tech savvy person has been doing for decades.

A fairly reasonable point. However, if Microsoft's OEM licensing only covered those units that actually ship with Windows, PC vendors would have an incentive (or a least much less disincentive) to support alternative OS builds on their devices. This would, IMHO, improve competition in the OS market and give end consumers greater choices.

Comment Re:Separate hardware from software (Score 1) 421

A law that forbids selling hardware and software together would increase innovation. Consumers would only be able to buy hardware and software separately. That way, hardware vendors are encouraged to document the hardware and software vendors will compete on quality. Installation procedures would become very easy very quickly due to market pressure.

Normal people don't like that though. Let's say that you try and sell product A to somebody that requires product B to function. This person has neither used nor ever had interest in A or B. Most people aren't interested in one or the other. Normal people want an A+B product where somebody else has worked out all of the compatibility problems.

You mean we can't have a check-box on the PC vendor's web page where we configure our device, which lists several operating systems? That's far too difficult, isn't it? The issue is Microsoft's OEM licensing agreements which charge a license fee for every unit sold, whether or not it has Windows. This creates a huge disincentive for vendors to pre-install (and, as you put it, work "out all of the compatibility isssues") alternative OS'.

Slashdot Top Deals

There are two ways to write error-free programs; only the third one works.

Working...