By putting baby diapers on her and her children's head to make them smarter.

He's already got a temporary patch up which will disable the vulnerable feature. (He also shows a few other ways of securing the issue)

http://forums.smallnetbuilder....

You've got to get this thing off of me it.. ]]ZZAP[[

It's awesome.

I like it.

It's better than Cats.

(you younglings will have to google for the reference)

Obviously Maytag did it and framed LG!

He'd make a good Roc... :)

Laddie, don't you think you should rephrase that?

Heh... although only Simon Pegg as Scotty good get away with a line like:
"Ach, maybe if I put some NOS into the Warp Core we could overtake 'em... what do I look like a stupid git? I'm givin' her all she's got!"

Uhh...
Wrath of Khan?
First Contact?
Into Darkness?

As I was discussing with enraged friends last night:
Obviously the plot won't be one of exploration or discovery or anything resembling hard sci-fi but then this is "AbramsTrek" and Lin's a good match for this.

Lin can do good action sequences and FF's storyline (simple as it is) has always impressed me with how much heart he could squeeze out of those characters. I could easily see him doing a good rendition of Arena or Errand of Mercy. (And if you do those stories Orci I want a finders fee). The question ultimately lies with the script and whether or not Orci screws him over.

McCoy: "Can he do it?"
Spock: "If he has the script, doctor. If he has the script."

Golly... where have I heard of that before...

They could call it Columbia...

Correct, but it was mere speculation before. Now they've PROVEN it.

Science!

Agreed - They could at least put transparent in quotes.

Is is "transparent" or is it a "reverse cloaking system"?

"I'm sorry Dave, I've BSOD'd... my mind... I can feel it going... I... I'm afraid I... qw30@#$%*(@#$... You seem to be trying to drive a car... How can I help?"

> Some cybersecurity experts even feel that the Second Amendment can be interpreted as applying to 'cyber arms'."

Uh huh... the 2nd amendment says I have the right to defend myself. That means I can own guns to defend myself when I'm being attacked... PHYSICALLY.

The proper analogy is that I have the right to secure my computer systems from being hacked by malcontents or governments (or both).

It does not give me the right to go over to the local printing press and blow them up if they're xeroxing my naked selfies. That's not defense, that's just vandalism.

Good lord can this world get any dumber...