Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Submission + - How can so many wrongs be a copyright? (arstechnica.com)

ColdWetDog writes: Ars is running perhaps the oddest copyright story ever. A small company called BlueBeat.com has decided that storing another copy of a copyrighted song (In this case, the Beatles) allows them to submit this new "performance" for copyright (which of course is owned by BlueBeat) and sell it legally. For $0.25 a track. Nice price. Weird lawyers. RIAA is not amused.

Comment Game designers don't read enough books (Score 1) 427

My favourite passage from that article:

While there have been some massive steps forward in terms of what games can and are willing to do story-wise though, plot is actually the aspect of game design which has come on the least in the last twenty years.

Graham Linehan recently said on Charlie Brooker’s GamesWipe that he thinks a lot of that is because game designers don’t read enough books and that modern games are made by people who watch more films than they read stories. He’s probably onto something there, we reckon – especially when you consider the rambling nonsense which is the Metal Gear Solid series.

The Almighty Buck

Submission + - Film Piracy, Organized Crime AND Terrorism 1

flip-flop writes: The RAND Corporation has just released a lengthy report titled "Film Piracy, Organized Crime, and Terrorism" attempting to link all three. The authors suggest that terrorists might be financing themselves through movie piracy — and in 3 out of 14 of their international case studies, they claim that profits from piracy end up with suspected terrorist organizations.
But now for the interesting part! Quote from the preface: The study was made possible by a grant from the Motion Picture Association (MPA). Ah, what a surprise...
Education

Submission + - Pope Acknowledges Evolution 1

teslatug writes: In a discussion with 400 priests Pope Benedict has admitted the merits of evolution saying "This clash [between creationism and evolution] is an absurdity because on one hand there is much scientific proof in favour of evolution, which appears as a reality that we must see and which enriches our understanding of life and being as such." How will this pronouncement affect the argument of the creationists who are against the teaching of evolution?

Slashdot Top Deals

"I've seen it. It's rubbish." -- Marvin the Paranoid Android

Working...