Bit of subtextual humor there. :-)

Yeah, yeah, yeah: but on the planet where the sun rises in the East, how do you instantiate this ownership, except via the state?

One may be a subset of the other, but AFTQ: was Marx for or against private property?

I think Gruber may represent the Clerisy quite accurately, as witnessed by the speed with which he has become an Unperson to the likes of Sebelius, Obama, and Princess Pelosi.

More accurately, I point out that more legislation == less freedom.

I find out the most remarkable things about my actions from you.

Unless the Other is doing it, when it's suddenly the Worst Thing Evar.

LTO tape
Is kinder than duct
When applied to the face
With the latter, you're Canucked.
Burma Shave

(1) Foment a bunch of rioting
(2) Cry big alligator tears about the effects
(3) ???
(4) [massage the numbers to declare] Profit!!!1!

We're not here to pick on your foolishness. :-)

Well, I'm certainly not your master. But I have to ask why the sudden appeal to "logical or reasonable defense"? I thought you were arguing a purely materialistic weltanschauung. Are arguments seasonal with you, or do you have some kind of D&D table with percentile dice to figure out what line of hooey to deploy?

He Stands There Appealing His Fruit

So you're saying he's not the sort of hypocrite who trumpets acts of charity. Got it.

Then who owns the means of production, if not the state? Marx certainly H8s private property, as that's what the Bourgeoisie is all about, right?

By "actual information", do you think Gruber is a representative sample?
I rather do. He seems to capture the overall commitment to veracity, respect for opinion at variance with his own, and dedication to ensuring that the will of We The People is carried out that one knows informs the Left at all levels.

The question's whether
On gubmint you bet
Or whether one's trust
In market is set
Burma Shave