Apparently it was due to Fox News-style "we don't actually have to portray reality" type of ruling.

All laws are about behaviour modification, whether it be deterring/reducing murder, theft, or jaywalking. You just happen to think your preferred behaviour should be exempt from legal limitations. Not a big surprise considering your post seems to peg you into the "Libertarian - the free market solves everything" bucket.

Probably has to do with residuals paid to actors. Don't forget that kerfuffle a few years back where writers wanted to be paid more for digital distribution because the previous agreement was just for physical media. You can bet that there are similar issues with actors and directors. So the studios/distributors make more profit on digital distribution (because they don't need to pay as much on residuals) and provide deals to Netflix et al. to encourage digital distribution over DVD rentals

Bingo!

The problem is, with all the naysayers and luddites, their combined negative outlook slows everything down instead of speeding it up by poisoning popular sentiment which is why it takes an Elon Musk to make electric cars and space companies. It's not that Ford could not have done it, it's that Ford and similar companies are staffed by people terrified to make a decision and try anything new unless it's 100% obvious that the time for a thing has come, which is usually when a competitor starts doing it.

No, in the case of electric cars it's that Ford and the other makers of ICE cars realize that they stand to make a bigger profit with ICE-based cars than with electric cars because maintenance cost of the ICEs is higher and they get a big cut of that pie. Because the barriers to entry in the vehicle production market are so high, it's better for the established players to continue business as usual until either legislation or new successful competitors force them to change.

The first gen Conroe Core 2 chips apparently used a similar design trick. It was after all primarily a return to the Pentium III core with a die shrink and some tweaks to support EMT64. Intel was scrambling to recover from the wasteful detour of the Pentium IV. It might have taken them one more gen before the redesign for full 64-bit ALUs - I don't remember anymore.

That laptop has a mobile consumer Pentium III. I'm pretty sure it didn't have PAE. Even so, it booted from USB, which used the standard DVD image, dd'd to the USB key. Not the same release admittedly ... but I didn't see anything indicating they had relaxed the PAE reqt. for Mint 13 Maya.

Yeah, I recently installed the most recent Linux Mint LTS (13 Maya) on a 12 year old laptop. It wouldn't boot from the CDs of older releases (presumably because it couldn't handle overburned CDs with more than 640MB). But I was able to use a Plop boot CD to boot from an old 1GB flash drive using the laptop's lone USB 1.1 port. So even without a PXEBoot server setup, there are still some options.

It was true for the first generation or two of Intel chips that supported AMD's 64-bit extensions. It hasn't been true for quite a while though.

Maybe he meant as on "order of magnitude" difference. But yeah, it's not an obvious thing.

Estimation usually involves combining a lot of rough guesses/factors together, using addition, multiplication, and other arithmetic operations. It's use as a process/data entry check is seriously limited if it also requires manual entry into a calculator.

Yep. There are lots of people with no running water and no electricity who have a phone.They charge them up using solar panels, car batteries, or get them charged at stores.

Interfaces between the human brain and tools are prone to human error like typing mistakes. 20th century physicists used to practice exercises in estimation trying to get answers within an order of magnitude. They usually didn't bother putting pen to paper for that check but did it mentally. It was a useful technique to double check that the real, accurate calculation wasn't subject to a processing/entry error. Yes, you would still find the mistake eventually without that check, but you would waste lots of time and effort before you did so. I don't see that calculating instruments have significantly changed that.

Apparently you can get charged with money laundering though.

Seriously, you expect us to believe that you got tutored by Feynman in quantum mechanics for the double slit experiment, but that you can't figure out that the orientation of mirror reversal is due to the horizontal alignment of binocular vision (a trivial optics problem)? Bad troll.