Well, it is an Intranet now...

I can see it now...Japan would have Veritech fighters and other battle robots within a year.

So, even after learning that it is a banned item, you tried to carry (presumably a second pair as the first were confiscated) a pair of pliers a second time?

I don't know about that...Democrats make a political strategy out of tossing more handouts to the "poor people" in order to get their vote. They make a political strategy out of racism just as much. Democrats also love to toss out the immigration talk to encourage the Hispanic vote, but they do just as little on the immigration issue as the Republicans.

Note how there is no way to do experiments in climate science. Now, you can run models, and they can be closer or farther from the actual, but actually running an experiment...nope.

I missread his comment. My bad.

I thought it said the latter, and missed totally the latter part of the statement.

The problem is who are the vested interests? The AGW scientists attack anything skeptical of AGW, and prevent everything being published. What science do you consider credible when it cannot be published in the journals?

I once heard a phrase that clearly sums up most of your argument.

If the waste is hot enough to hurt you, it is hot enough to produce power.

If we would stop the silly refusal to reprocess waste, and start reprocessing all the waste we have, we could stop mining Uranium for 1000s of years.

It is also much easier to deal with the waste when it takes up much less volume, and is only dangerous for a short time.

The Anti-vax people really have an issue with something that doesn't exist anymore. Mercury in some form was used as a stabilizer in older vaccines. This is where the behavioral/brain problems came from, and has been addressed in all current vaccines.

I prefer the name Pro-Murder for the Pro-Choice people. It makes the Pro-Life argument more obvious.

It is derived from the sound a whip makes, not the food product. A cracker is the person who would enforce discipline and "encourage" work from the slaves.

I would also point out the school shooting threat against the Utah university.

So cutting out the important part of the sentence to make your point is a valid arguing method now?

Criticizing someone who happens to be female for things that have nothing to do with her being a female could be misogyny, but is not guaranteed to be misogyny.

SJW = Social Justice Warrior.

They are people who see Racism and Sexism in everything except themselves.

I don't disagree with what you say, just one piece.

It is the Autism Spectrum, of which Asperger's Syndrome is one condition. The current DSM no longer has any of the sub catagories of Autism, it is now all just called Autism Spectrum Disorders.

Yes, I have Asperger's Syndrome (as diagnosed many years ago), but I don't use it as a crutch or excuse.