Comment Re:No more narrator? (Score 1) 612
Hmmmm....I was wondering about that too. Maybe they used xtranormal to hide the identity of the speaker.
Hmmmm....I was wondering about that too. Maybe they used xtranormal to hide the identity of the speaker.
No, actually I think the how is much more relevant. Are you saying that if there's a good why, than the how (B61 vs GBU-57) is not important? Clearly the country and it's allies would disagree with you.
Yes, but I believe arranging the sequence is the trick. That's like saying you have a briefcase with 20 keys...
I think the operational phrase here is "if a sample could be taken". I'm assuming that since the military doesn't want folks to find out what the sequence is, they probably have their own secret strain of algae/moss/bamboo/whatever that's locked away in a lab somewhere. Swab it off the top of the bolt? I'm sure they thought of that.
According to this whitepaper, the DNA sequencing is "unequivocally uncopyable".
I've tried this pretty successfully in the past. The only problem is that it has trouble with CSS and some of the newer technologies sometimes. Not always that easy to work with.
You should definitely try Amaya
Hmmm...interesting. I've never thought about it like that before. So, basically it says that the government will protect your ideas to encourage you to make them (and profit from them) in the short term so we can all benefit from them later.
How is it for public interests (not being facetious, I'd really like to know)?
Those who can, do; those who can't, write. Those who can't write work for the Bell Labs Record.