Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Consumers will choose the best option (Score 1) 399

Nope.

There are millions of people who aren't carrying phones. I only carry one when I'm paid to do so (and provided with the phone) and that's only happened twice in the last 20 years.

It's true that smartphones are useful to many people and desirable for even more. But lots of us don't want or need them at all; they'd just be a burden of maintenance and cost, and essentially a lifestyle downgrade.

Submission + - The rising cost of decommissioning a nuclear power plant (thebulletin.org)

Lasrick writes: A look at cost estimates of nuclear power plant decommissioning from the 1980s, and how widely inaccurate they turned out to be. This is a pretty fascinating look at past articles in the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists that consistently downplayed the costs of decommissioning, for example: 'The Yankee Nuclear Power Station in Rowe, Massachusetts, took 15 years to decommission—or five times longer than was needed to build it. And decommissioning the plant—constructed early in the 1960s for $39 million—cost $608 million. The plant’s spent fuel rods are still stored in a facility on-site, because there is no permanent disposal repository to put them in. To monitor them and make sure the material does not fall into the hands of terrorists or spill into the nearby river costs $8 million per year.'

Submission + - Heartbleed Turned Against Cyber Criminals 1

Rambo Tribble writes: In a case of 'live by the sword, die by the sword', researchers have used the now-infamous Heartlbeed bug in OpenSSL to gain access to black-hat forums. French researcher, Steven K, is quoted as saying, 'The potential of this vulnerability affecting black-hat services is just enormous.' Reportedly, the criminal-minded sites Darkode and Damagelab have already been compromised.

Submission + - The Joel Test for your codebase (davejsaunders.com)

craigtp writes: In August 2000, Joel Spolsky wrote The Joel Test, a checklist to judge the quality of a software team. This is just as valid today.

The team is vitally important, but so is the code you spend 8+ hours a day working on. Here’s an equivalent of the Joel Test to measure how easy your code-base is to work on.

(Google cache link in case of Slashdotting)

Comment Re:Almost there (Score 1) 171

I personally have installed an RO filter (any monkey with a crescent wrench should be able to do the same) and we have a crapload of klean kanteen-style stainless bottles...

Stainless steel is a filthy metal unless you're using the newer silver-coated stuff.

Seems a shame to use water from an expensive reverse osmosis filter in an inherently disease-friendly container - why not use a nice glass bottle, or a silver or copper one if you're worried about breakage?

Comment I can't believe I have to post this. (Score 2) 769

Or does the choice of cause mean that one billionaire trying to influence politics is worse than the other billionaire trying to influence politics?

Well, pretty obviously yes. In this universe, anyway.

For example, a billionaire influencing politics so that certain ethnicities are rounded up and placed in offshore torture camps is clearly worse than a billionaire influencing politics so that charities that provide surgery for children with cleft palates are exempt from taxation.

Jebus, I hope you were trolling.

Comment Not everyone can have an antenna, sorry. (Score 1) 195

I live in the bottom of a little valley, and I'd need a hundred foot tower to get more than two TV stations.

In my state, it's illegal to have a tower so tall that it could fall outside your property line. My property isn't two hundred feet wide, so no go.

But I ditched Comcast anyway and got Verizon instead. Verizon sucks too, but marginally less, and the FIOS technology is nice, at least, even if the provider isn't.

Comment Bingo, we have a winner. (Score 1) 179

So yeah, Vermont Yankee going offline will change things, but we'll manage. Indeed, losing a source of subsidized power will create more opportunities for expansion of renewables.

And that is almost certainly the whole and entire real reason for opposition to the plant closing.

Remember, Green is the New Red.

Comment Re:and yet even more (Score 1) 179

Well, let me know when automobile waste has a half-life equivalent to that of nuclear waste, then.

It's a false equivalency. Yes, coal and oil subsidies are bad, but that doesn't mean the Bush/Cheney nuclear subsidies aren't substantially worse.

Nuclear was on the way out until Cheney stepped in and threw regulated capitalism out the window in favor of Soviet-style centralized economic decisionmaking.

Comment Yep, you pegged it. (Score 3, Insightful) 179

Well, that is how they stay competitive with all the other subsidized industries.

In theory, the government subsidies are intended to further social goals that the free market cannot adequately address without regulation.

In practice, the government subsidies are treats that the political powers (such as congressmen) hand out to economic powers (such as favored contributors).

Since our economic powers have evolved into multinational corporations that actively oppose our social goals and purposely subvert our cultural values, this means that the government subsidies are quite often doing the exact opposite of what they are nominally intended to do.

Slashdot Top Deals

The one day you'd sell your soul for something, souls are a glut.

Working...