Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re: Another silly decision (Score 1) 480

I really can't see the reason for buying a condominium though -- you pay just as much, and own no land

Not strictly true, in fee simple ownership, you own a share in the land under the condo complex. For us, a condo is a good choice as we're retired and don't want to deal with yard work and most infrastructure maintenance. Of course, we face a monthly condo fee that escalates somewhat.

Comment Re:Honestly (Score 1) 187

I have to agree. The guy says it creates poetry that can't be distinguished from "real" poetry. Maybe so ... if you consider any old junk that any self-styled "poet" writes.

Try comparing with a true poet like Tennyson or Teasdale or even Charles Dodgson (aka Lewis Carroll).

Comment Re:BASICally my reply is... (Score 2) 259

I am myself an MIT grad and I can testify to the fact that foreign language instruction at MIT was every bit as rigorous as CS instruction. That said, MIT did not have a specific admissions requirement for foreign language instruction in secondary school, although it was a distinguishing "plus" in a super-competitive admissions process.

If a university has a foreign language admissions requirement for a specific reason (as opposed to just something put in place by a non-knowledgeable regulator), then it's hard to see how CS can substitute for that. If the foreign language requirement doesn't have a particular reason, there's no purpose in it.

My own opinion, as someone who took the time to become conversant in numerous foreign languages, is that, particularly for Americans, foreign language study is an important means of learning about cultures beyond our shores ... something Americans need to do a lot better at.

Comment Re:O...okay? (Score 2) 134

This last comment is very insightful and addresses something I've thought about from time to time.

You pay whatever it is that Windows costs (no, it isn't free just because it's bundled on a computer), and then what do you have? Actually, not much. You have an operating system and a few tools (and maybe a bunch of bundled demo crapware).

You install Ubuntu or Mint or similar, and you have a suite of tools, and the means to easily install more, for free. Like Inkscape, as the lead article discusses. Within half an hour or less you can have full-featured computing that should meet at least 90% of the needs of 90% of users (maybe even better than that). I'm not going to get into the arguments about specialized tools or high-end features or cutting-edge gaming; if you truly need such things, go buy them and put them on your Windows system.

Linux has served me for many years. In the early years, things were rougher around the edges, but today, it's night and day difference. As I'm not much of a gamer, there is little or nothing that I need Windows for. I "get by" just fine with GIMP, and the new Inkscape is amazing, as is LibreOffice ... not to mention EMACS, of course :)

Sorry but I just don't see a personal need to spend money on software.

Comment Re:Civility shouldn't have borders (Score 0) 361

All they did was port unix to x86 and give it away for free. Hardly an accomplishment. Not much innovation going on with Linux, other than it's an alternative to paid options for OS's on x86. Linux Developers = we shit in our own nest, so you don't have to.

"All" they did? What they did was provide a choice, and a rather good one.

Slashdot Top Deals

Living on Earth may be expensive, but it includes an annual free trip around the Sun.

Working...