Comment Re:Sorry, no "dirty tricks" campaign here... (Score 1) 1060
When in Rome! You have to deal with the laws where you reside
I live in Rome, you insensitive clod!
When in Rome! You have to deal with the laws where you reside
I live in Rome, you insensitive clod!
What a strange thing to say: "observed by a team of researchers, including Canadians"
Does this mean the Canadians aren't team players or they weren't researchers (were they just tourists?)
This Canadian wants to know!
I think it has something to do with the initial line which says "Canadian_Daemon writes "
Yeah, probably he cringes at the confusion between "Web" and "Internet" when people report that.
It's "Vince" not Vint, einstein.
It's Vinton Gray "Vint" (also, Cerf, not Einstein
You know, initially, going through your comment, I was like "wtf, why is this modded funny, idiot
You can take it a lot further than that.
Here's a screenie of my firefox right now. I ripped the "full screen" module (called notitlebar@vrienduinen, not my work, I just messed with its insides a little) out of a chrome lookalike pack, adjusted bars to my liking (the 2 icons between the menus and the AwesomeBar are 2 bookmarklets, ReaditLater and InstaPaper (Hi Marco, love the product!)), made the right buttons not overlap with a few spacers, nuked the Google search box without losing the function via OmniBar, then via stylish I messed with many more things than I care to remember (removed scrollbars, the throbber/favicon and close button on non-active tabs, made current tab much wider, killed a few more buttons and spacers, actually made the margin betwen the 2 top bars negative, etc).
It's most likely a usability trainwreck (I actually love to have "normal" people borrow my PC for a sec and watch them helpless for a few seconds, then I'll have mercy and give them a normal chrome window
This is as close to full screen as I can go without feeling I'm missing some familiar UI function: I still have a lot of room to show the current URL (I love to see parameters, and change them
Cause I remember fiddling with stuff like A M P back in the late '80s. hey I still remember its NUA: 023422020010700 (power of the young brain, I was 14 and pretty much everything I read tended to stick).
de gustbus non est disputandem
Please..... if you choose to quote latin to sound important, you might want to consider taking the time and attention to avoid 2 errors in 5 words.
Given that, outside the solar system, there's hardly anything closer than a couple parsecs except for some very faint objects, and 1 parsec is 1 parallax *second* (as in, 1/3600th of a degree), and it represents the angle formed by watching the same object from 2 observation points spaced 1AU (or 2AU?) apart, does this allow any actual 3d effect to be perceived by the brain? The left/right image separation should be insufficient (unless of course the content has been heavily software processed).
Also, please, don't release anaglyphs, there's a lot of different video hardware to enable 3d vision. Just release video with the left/right frames (side-by-side, above/below, alternating, you choose) and let each of us view it optimally on our hardware. There's plenty of software to accomplish that, even java applets and browser plugins.
Me to. The neural interface to show them to my friends is a bitch though.
Not for Spock!
My mind to your mind
Your pr0n to my pr0n
Yeah telephones and PBXs are much easier to use (actually they're _not_, but we've all been trained long ago to their user interface), but this whole
To whomever just modded the parent (me) as funny: it's not funny. It's damn amazing, and awe-inspiring.
It's a naive, domestic operating system without any breeding, but I think you'll be amused by its presumption.