Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Isreal (Score 1, Interesting) 383

Self defense is not terrorism. A war of self defense will be ugly and when you look at individual events, there will be some things that are not fair. However, Israel is 100% right to fight the PLO and Hamas and kill Palestinian terrorists whenever they have opportunity. When the terrorists hide in civilian houses, they are right to bulldoze the houses. Etc.

Over an entire generation of people raised in an open air prison. Fighting the predictable consequences of this fact is not "self defense" -- its something quite evil.

Imagine living your whole life in an open air concentration camp from birth to death, and your children subject to the same thing. Or imagine being one of those children from birth, and your parents were subject to the same thing from birth to death.

Yeah... "self defense" with tanks, jets, and nukes, vs a people in concentration camps.

Comment Re:BCD mode (Score 1) 140

When your chip is compiling/executing nearly every opcodes into microcode on the fly, it's time we retire the inefficient instruction set.

That doesnt make it inefficient in the performance sense. Your argument is born from knowing just enough to be terribly wrong, probably because the RISC fanboys convinced you to stop considering relevant details

If two designs can fetch N bytes of instructions per cycle then the design that packs more relevant operations into that N-bytes wins on performance. The relevant detail you missed is this exact bottleneck. Intel's design ultimately fetches more micro-ops per cycle than is possible with a more RISCy design, which is why even ARM is doing it now.

Comment Re:Cutting edge has unknowns! Who would have thoug (Score 1) 47

Building something different to what anyone has built before is a bit hard to quote for, and that's the main, should be incredibly obvious point

So about half the projects come under budget and the other half over budget? no? they all go over budget? yeah... proof that the problem isnt how hard it is to quote for, but instead how easy it is to get more than you quoted.

Comment original used non-union actors (Score 5, Interesting) 360

Lucas and Spielberg made the decision to use non-union actors in the first movie because the union demanded certain types of intro-credits which was believed would spoil the feel of the movie.

So the rest of the industry informally blacklisted the actors. The only actor to survive the blacklist was Harrison Ford because Spielberg also used him in Indiana Jones, and the industry wasn't going to balk at a guy that could bring in hundreds of millions for every movie he was involved in. Even Billy Dee Williams, who already had made a rather big name for himself, couldn't survive the blacklist.

Comment Re:caveat emptor (Score -1, Troll) 264

A bunch of poor people, with limited access to the internet, turn to one of the only sources of information they have.

Would you argue the same about a fucking tabloid newspaper?

How is the consumer supposed to know otherwise when they have no access to better information?

The same way its always been... PUT EFFORT INTO DECISIONS

"How was I supposed to know it was just snake oil?"

But for people who only can get to wikipedia through their basic cell phone plans .... that was the only source of information.

No, it fucking wasn't. Are you fucking retarded? Information only comes on cell phones now? Really? idiot.

Comment Re:But they help also (Score 1) 366

Oh, please. I am no friend of the rent-seeking, regulatory-capture taxi cartel, but Uber is unethical as hell.

So go after them for that... instead of an excuse that literally supports evil.

Its as if you are saying "Uber is unethical, therefore I want the very things that makes the existing system evil to triumph over Uber! Go evil!"

Comment Re:But they help also (Score 0) 366

That price is for a business medallion is purchased by a company that runs the car 24 hours a day in 3 shifts bringing in $300,000 / yr. or more.

The high price is the price all medallions go for, so what you are saying is that the only folks that can have a cab license are those that run them 24/7.

This line is always trotted out by people who dont understand NYC medallions.

You seemed to have been hinting that less than 100% of taxi's have medallions.

Why not come out and make a direct statement about what you seem to think is wrong with my statements, instead of the bullshit hinting shit you are doing now so that people cant just label you a dishonest fuck and be done with you.

Comment Re:the establishment really does not like competit (Score 1) 366

Keep in mind however that only a handful of cities use Medallions.

At least the medallion system, as abhorrent as it is, allows the licenses to be transfered to other individuals. In most other places its even worse than the medallion system where there not only is an artificially limited supply, you've got to also be on the good graces of the local bureaucrat gatekeeper when there is an opening.

Comment Re:Wrong Take, Liar (Score -1, Troll) 366

Instead you went with... "it doesn't even matter if Uber is exploitive" ...This is just inflammatory rhetoric and you know it.

The fact that you start throwing around crap ("inflammatory rhetoric!!!!") instead of arguments ("here is some logic...") means that its YOU thats throwing around inflammatory rhetoric. The post with the statement you are calling inflammatory rhetoric what loaded with detailed logic about the viewpoint, while you just spout fucknothings.

Comment Re:But they help also (Score 1, Flamebait) 366

"...they should have no problems complying with basic licensing requirements..."

..such as the requirement of obtaining the $1,000,000 medallions required to operate a cab in Manhattan.

Yep, Statists (like you) dont see this as a problem. The proof is that Statists like you can be quoted as saying "they should have no problems complying."

You just defended evil.

Comment Re:Space for solar hasn't been much of a concern (Score 1) 437

What you describe probably could be done and without inventing anything new or fancy. What it DOES require is money, lots of money. Who is going to pay for all that?

One of the things I have learned over the years is that Californians don't worry about silly things like budgets and how to pay for things, and even less so the consequences involved in budgeting and paying for things.

This is the State that has repeatedly fucked up its energy industry to the point of severe crisis. Seems to be planning to do it yet again.

Slashdot Top Deals

The key elements in human thinking are not numbers but labels of fuzzy sets. -- L. Zadeh

Working...