Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:No shit (Score 1) 1110

The defectiveness of the Start Screen isn't a matter of it "being hard". For me, it disrupts the context information in my brain for the task I'm currently doing. It isn't hard, it's annoying. And, same as with Clippy of days past, it isn't hard to bypass, but it's annoying all the same. It hinders me, it disrupts me from getting things done. And that is all the reason I need to shun it.

Incidentally, I feel perfectly justified to complain often and loudly about the Start Screen, as this is my only small way of providing feedback to Microsoft. Feedback, that, accumulated with thousands of others, hopefully will result in a change to disable Metro.

Comment Re:This was required by law. Really. (Score 1) 768

free summer stays for its employees

Renumeration. Taxed as income.

It buys you a private jet

Renumeration. Taxed as income.

It also pays you in cash, but in some tax haven so you don't have to pay US income tax.

Renumeration. Taxed as income. If there is tax-treaty with that country, tax already payed in foreign country on that income is tax-deductable (or vice versa).

flat tax rate it wouldn't really help. The people with the most would still pay substantially less than the rate you set.

And while I'm at it, I'll suggest a _progressive_ tax rate.

Comment Re:Take that! (Score 3, Interesting) 519

Actually, a pair of boots stuffed with a few insoles sounds like a *perfect* place to keep a (fragile piece of art/ornate watch). Depending on the material of the boots, they could protect the watch from any mishandling of the luggage. Yes, he could have put the watch in a separate box, but that box would have taken up space on its own. This just sounds to me like efficient use of space.

Comment Re:Napping (Score 1) 277

Hell, there could even be evolutionary advantages for some people to sleep longer/deeper than others. Some people being more awake/alert during the night; others better rested during the day. That could be advantageous in a hunter/gatherer civilization.

Comment Re:NAT to the rescue! (Score 1) 232

Besides, It's a part of the atmosphere... flayed and mounted on Lexan hanging from my wall (with lots of carefully routed wires and a few pretty lights that blink intermittently) -- I find wallputers more interesting/functional at than most paintings, plus it's easier to clean, takes up less space and promotes a cozy cyber-punk feel.

Your ideas are intriguing to me and I wish to subscribe to your newsletter.

Comment Re:NAT to the rescue! (Score 1) 232

Explain this to me; why is UPnP so insecure? UPnP can only be switched on by a random application if that application has access to the LAN. That application is then _already_ running locally on one of the machines on the network. It can _already_ connect to random machines/ports. If that application now wants to exploit a vulnerability on one of the machines connected to the LAN, it can do it directly, no need to configure any port forwarding to let yet something else in.

I haven't yet read any realistic argumentation on why UPnP is dangerous (and I looked!). Mainly just FUD. The only security issue I can see is that _after_ the baddies take over your PC, they can open up ports.

Comment Re:Too many drones, not enough eyeballs. (Score 1) 178

From http://www.boeing.com/news/releases/2005/q1/nr_050214s.html

The two X-45As began the latest test, known as Peacekeeper, by departing from Edwards and climbing to altitudes of 24,500 and 25,500 ft respectively. Separated by approximately 25 miles and operating at Mach .65 (225 knots), the jets began their combat air patrol (CAP) mission to provide airborne alert over the exercise area. Tasked with suppression of enemy air defenses, the two vehicles were given two simulated pop-up ground threats to eliminate.

Once alerted to the first threat, the X-45As autonomously determined which vehicle held the optimum position, weapons and fuel load to properly attack the target. After making that decision, one of the X-45As changed course and the pilot-operator allowed it to attack the simulated ground-based radar. Following a successful strike, another simulated threat emerged and was subsequently destroyed by the second X-45A. The two X-45As completed their mission and safely returned to Edwards.

In the future, ground-based pilots will be controlling multiple combat aircraft with high-level commands: Patrol that sector, destroy target, refuel, RTB.

Slashdot Top Deals

Those who can, do; those who can't, write. Those who can't write work for the Bell Labs Record.

Working...