That sounds expensive.... I think these people have already cost too much,.. they should be required to bludgeon themselves to death with one of those crates of source print outs they submitted to the poor judge years ago. See, recycling can be entertaining!

That would make it easier.. they go a lot slower down there.

I think their physical presence is still in Utah: Contact Us, but I admit I did very little research and mostly depended on a vague association remembered from years ago ^_^

They are probably still borrowing to pay the lawyers, or they have bills piling up with the lawyers too invested to simply quit.. kinda like a 419 scam.

I think at this point a 'reasonable offer' would be a bag of corn nuts. At least then their VC parters would get a snack out of the deal.

A few square kilometers of Utah is a small price to pay....

Best, worse, it is all relative.

As someone who cut their teeth with C++ and Java, I found ObjC to be the most sane of the bunch, but then again I ended up really liking both C and SmallTalk when I started using them, and found both C++ and Java to be kludgy 'design by comity' languages.

I am noticing that through this tread, we started with 'Apple will allow users to restrict installations' to 'Apple will no longer allow non-'App' applications'. Good example of whisper down the lane rumors.... 'what if' becomes 'fact' in only a few pages...

I never intended to claim that binary explosives themselves are a myth, just that liquid ones, specifily powerful ones that can be smuggled in bottles and can easily be combined in such an environment, are.

The only 'binary' explosives involving liquids that I have heard of being used in the field are along the lines of 'gas+lighter'. Such liquid explosives are difficult to mix and require not only lab equipment but careful temperature control and significant time. There is no way these people could have actually mixed such a thing on a moving plane. The cell in question had no idea what they were doing.