Too much focus on the articles, who on earth comes to Slashdot for the articles these days with the awful editing?

This Ask Slashdot has to be in the top 10 worst Ask Slashdots...

The area where is happened was north of the 60th parallel south, which is outside the jurisdiction of the ATS.

That's right, summary is completely false.

A case of not reading the article, it's blatant FUD.

A committee like this is usually asking the question "What's so different about Australia that prices are so much higher than else where in the world? What is causing it?". It's to determine what the cause is so the government can implement measures into the marketplace to make it more attractive for suppliers to reduce their prices.

What is this garbage?

I think I'd rather IBM's Watson, I think it's shown a lot of promise in natural language parsing and I think it would do a better job than anything The Washington Post can come up with.

Don't forget Halliburton

Is someone giving us a less than subtle hint?

http://www.scalify.com/dist-validation.html

Depends on jurisdiction though, there are some western jurisdictions where lack of a published policy and access control mechanisms can imply open access which is enough to argue in court.

One of the few mini-ITX platforms with Tegra3

Keep in mind Federal Court Justice Annabelle Bennett was referring to why this wasn't in mediation, that's it.

False premise gets hits.

The headline is disingenuous, the servers belonged to the ABC (Australian Broadcasting Corporation) and whilst they are funded by the government, they are independent due to the Australian Broadcasting Corporation Act of 1983. ABC's Corporate Structure and the Charter of Independence and Accountability.