Comment Re:DNA? (Score 1) 222
Waiting to put on a black shirt?
Who is first on your extermination list?
Waiting to put on a black shirt?
Who is first on your extermination list?
If the civilian police could do the search, then they probably should have.
If the search was done on-duty, it used military resources and so should not be reported.
You'd be surprised how much use can be made of 30 minutes of information. Also, in the absence of an accident, the information you mentioned cannot determine if anyone was actually put at risk. Practically no car has GPS connected with control positions and few record 30 minutes.
Will legacy cars have an automatic out since the recorded information won't be there?
How about if the black box malfunctions or "malfunctions"
Interestingly, your brief description of the method was enough to google up a heap of research on Google.
Since you said non-sterile and mentioned surgery, I'll guess this is isolated intestinal loop dialysis?
What was the improvement?
So it's public domain, used by thousands but you can't say what it is and I couldn't possibly read about it? Not even a little hint?
Is it in Dan Brown's next novel by chance? You realize you make the whole thread sound like 'beef by-products', yes?
In this case, it is a violation of the Posse Comitatus Act (look up a few posts). That act is what keeps the military from doing civilian law enforcement. It ran afoul of it because an NCIS agent did a search on civilians.
The perp isn't terribly sympathetic in this case but the act is very important and calls for strict protection.
You're going to need a much more expensive black box to log enough to make the results unambiguous. They'll have to log enough information to make them prime targets for warrant-less searches for non-safety purposes.
The crazy prison population comes mainly from non-violent drug offenses.
Or they could quit designing cars to deliver the contents of the engine compartment to your lap.
First, your 'freebie' is ruinous to some people (we're talking living in a shelter losing the kids sort of ruinous). The second is ruinous to nearly anyone.
So don't do it, you say. Fine as soon as cops start only writing fair and just tickets without quotas AND as soon as traffic court runs the kangaroos out and takes the right to a fair trial seriously.
Until; those very unlikely things happen, perhaps a court ordered technological solution with NO fine is more appropriate.
No extension is needed at all if we had reasonable people in government (I know, belly laugh time) especially in the courts (OK, I'll stop before you break a rib).
So it was, in fact, developed by a non-capitalist system? Can you give me the title of the publication, I'd like to look it up.
I would need to know more about the non-profit (they're not all the same). Why not donate the idea to the public domain and publish the whole thing?
There are two ways to write error-free programs; only the third one works.