That'd be true if it was slander. This is basically a political op-ed site, which is protected under the constitution. The slander against bloggers/websites has been tried before and found to be afforded the same protections as any print publication, which includes print publications by political opinion entities.

I just had a scary thought of instead of using linux, they just program a "UAV flight game" and leave them in various Air Force recreation centers.

Its the Air Force, it'd be an Airwolf cluster.

Hey, I just added white noise to your song and copyrighted it as a derivative work! Next I'll add pink noise and call it the "Radio Remix" and copyright that.

"(we can only hope that as Windows 7 gains popularity, this trend will reverse)"

Why oh WHY would you even want to hope for that? I think a better thing to hope for would be for Windows XP to lose popularity. Hell, I'd rather see people transition to... *shudder* a mac over Vista Remarketed.

And before I get the "Why don't you try it" or "You're a mac fanboi" crap: My network is 7 linux boxen (2 Cell, 3 SPARC, 2 AMD64) 2 Server 2008 (1 as a workstation, 1 as a DC) 1 Win7 Ultimate, and a hoard (lost count) of Win XP laptops. No macs. No Linux on anything that isn't some form of server.

"They might sell countries weapons as we do, but there will something in there that is left out of the export package."

Yea, the instruction manual.

You forgot Open Source Intelligence, Open Source recruiting.... Next thing you know they'll crowd source 4chan against a religion...

Of common sense. There should be some things allowed within reason though. I can think of a few things that have "bank" in them that would not ever be misinterpreted as being a bank.

Got to have something for the 2010 netbook line up.

Make a netbook with an HDMI connector on it so it uses 1/3rd the size of a DVI connector and get a HDMI to DVI cable.

That's ok, according to M theory, it'd just destroy one copy of spacetime.

SLAPP doesn't apply as its not really abuse of the system. If it was, the RIAA would have gotten shut down quite a few times by now. The model never performed any legal action that named the blogger directly to force the blogger into litigation just to cause the loss of money or to be annoying. Its gaming the system, but unfortunately, the model can get away with it by saying "Once I found out it was a nobody, I didn't see the point of persuing litigation."

Google on the other hand seems like they would have a decent SLAPP case if the blogger tries to get cute.

IANAL.

This is usually in the section dealing with 3rd party companies. Context, context, context...