But I'm assuming that sooner of later the asshats will win. Ergo, I'm stocking up hard on Russian-bought music and movies. If it all came to a halt tomorrow, I have two very nice collections. I'll never go see another film in a theater, though, or rent a DVD. And the last music nickel the RIAA made off of me was circa 2005.
That carries as much weight for me as Steve BLAMMER stating that he's going to &^%&$!! bury Google.
Noise with no real content. Next.
It was great for five years or so, then the third generation of this family-owned started flexing their muscles, invoking a new unsaid policy that unless you could prove otherwise, the assumption was that you were a lazy goof-off who should be demoted or fired.
Thus was born the semiannual evaluations from hell process.
I would typically spend 20-40 hours applying loads of manure to my evaluation in an effort to be spared the axe. So would every other salaried employee in the billion-dollar company. This was time that could have been used in improving our production numbers via technology (I was an intranet developer). Instead, we had to slather our way though an incomprehensible eval process that forced us to make predictions based on absolutely no data. Basically, we had to try to read the minds of a couple of dysfunctional family members who now found themselves in officer positions.
They probably couldn't get warehouse worker jobs for Wal-Mart, thank God (for them) that they were members of the family.
I've been gone about a year now, others are going over the wall as other jobs make themselves available. The company has managed to grow in a bad economy, but when things get better, I predict a Microsoft-like turn for the worse, as folks who can afford Hostess or Dolly Madison snack cakes leave in droves.
I'm not saying that the psychotic salaried evals are causing the downfall of the company, but they certainly are a barometer of how things in general are going. Just like Microsoft.
Good for you, CNET. Please, also add that they may kiss your collective ass for asking.
That was before they destroyed Napster, and proceeded on to suing folks of all shapes, sizes, colors, and ages for, basically, copying albums to cassettes.
Now, I buy my music from Russian websites. The RIAA gets zilch. I get mp3's which are of a high enough quality that I highly prize them, and keep them redundantly backed up.
I also share with friends, via sneakernet.
If an artist blows me away (e.g. Bonnie Bramlett, of Delaney and Bonnie), and are clearly not already fabulously wealthy (e.g. Mick Jagger), I actually will track down their agent and send them a modest check from my S corporation. It's a tax-deductable contribution to someone who has earned their pay.
Otherwise, i might visit an artist's website and score some bling.
You see, money passes from my hands to a music seller. It passes from my hands directly to the artist. Or it passes from my hands to an enterprise connected with the artist that pays nothing to the RIAA.
You can say downloaders are destroying the traditional business model for music, RIAA, but the reals criminal here is staring back at you in the mirror. You have managed to anger me (and how many millions of others) enough to work out a fair and square way to purchase guilt-free music.
The answer to the question of Life, the Universe, and Everything is... Four day work week, Two ply toilet paper!