Comment Net Neutrality (Score 2) 54
This has nothing to do with content, it's preventing ISPs from charging based on what services you use, which has never happened.
The more interesting effect of this would be another example for the supreme court to consider in killing the Chevron deference. This started in the early 80s with a supreme court case that said, if a federal regulation is vague, a court should defer to whatever the relevant federal agency's interpretation of that regulation is. A big part of that, though, is the interpretation has to be consistent. If it changes every four years with whatever party happens to be in power, that doesn't work. That's what has been happening, though, so the end result of all this vacillating might be the supreme court saying that federal agencies can't make it up as they go along any more, and have to wait for congress to pass more succinct laws.