They have identical ideologies.

AI has enough potential for harm to jobs as-is.

No sense in giving it the benefit of the doubt.

They're fine with their zampolit when it's doing the attack.
They're cowardly when they're being publicly called out on it.

They want to dilute their pool by forcing nature to bend to their will.

If the human isn't in full command, bad things tend to happen.

Given the behavior of those supporting his termination, that is evidence enough.

Consider yourself informed.

Yes.

Not only did they fire him, they also encouraged others to virtue signal their retaliation against him.

For such an "inclusive" and "tolerant" company, they sure are quite Soviet in their treatment of dissent.

To those supporting Google's termination, any deviation from the approved narrative is an emergency.

Looks like Google decided to help Damore make his case by reinforcing their bias against differing opinion. Science also supports (mirror) his conclusions.

Since Silicon Valley is informing us that we've hit the target, double down on any measures against guest workers.

If you're talking about the Poynter Institute or the International Fact-Checking Network, no such luck. They're effectively self-audited (by a friendly organization), and receive funding from an organization invested in opposing Trump.

Given that the fact-checkers are not exactly neutral themselves, I'd take an entire geologic basin's worth of NaCl before believing their "arbiters".