Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Easy example of bad policy (Score 2, Insightful) 18

This is an easy example of how badly the TLD policies were drafted/managed. Tech people making decisions like this is a continual experiment in governance, except nobody ever learns from the mistakes because they don't realise it is governance.

The misuse of .tv and explosion of TLDs more or less mirrors all the junk that's made its way into Unicode because nobody ever had the standing and sense combined to say "no" and stick to it.

Comment Re:Immature (Score 1) 141

What, did they kill your cat or something? Were you an OS/2 user? Apple fan?

Corporations are not your friend, but they also don't have stable personalities over the long term that it makes sense to attach blame (or praise) to. The bad old days of Microsoft probably don't have a lot of employee overlap with their current employees. Meaning that you're probably mostly just angry at a name.

Comment Wary (Score 2) 211

I don't want CTOs designing social policy - when they try to write our laws or just ignore them, that's a big problem (Musk being an obvious example), but I likewise want there to be a really good reason whenever we're voting to decide what technology exists; it shouldn't be a normal thing.

Comment Ineffective (Score 3, Insightful) 162

There's nothing wrong with wanting to put pressure on China over concrete things (potential invasion of Taiwan, efforts to control lives of people of Chinese ethnicity in other countries, poor civil rights, etc). This is not an intelligent way to do it; export controls won't work with a country like China.

Comment Re:Guardrails were never the solution (Score 1) 111

If we ever get near AGI, the kind of LLMs we have now will seem like toys. LLMs significantly make up for the fact that real language doesn't work without context and without access to a lot of other parts of a mind. If we imagine in an AGI that those parts are there, we'd want to ditch every LLM and develop language subsystems more naturally.

Comment Guardrails were never the solution (Score 3, Insightful) 111

The idea that the technology could be both open and have guardrails glued-on was a fantasy, and it's more important that the technology be open. It's not like these LLMs are producing something a reasonably intelligent college-age couldn't put together with a bit of research. Seeing this as a danger is stupid.

Comment Re:Some interesting moral questions here. (Score 1) 189

If you're only interested in the worst case rather than the average case, and ignore that cases like the above both create outrage and, as extreme outliers, get corrected, you're missing the plot.

Real support structures are indeed highly integrated, but they're not always voluntary. There are times when involuntary is justified (not always), and even when things are not voluntary, force should be rare. When people won't come in off the street voluntarily, leaving them there is neglect and it's worse for everyone.

Comment Re:Some interesting moral questions here. (Score 1) 189

There's nothing wrong with a nanny state.

Beyond that, there's a general understanding that if someone's about to die in some bit of the wilderness, some institution will try to rescue them. Even if they entered into it with eyes open, accepted the danger, signed the paperwork, whatever. Preventing people from doing really stupid stunts that will almost certainly require later rescue is pretty reasonable.

Slashdot Top Deals

In seeking the unattainable, simplicity only gets in the way. -- Epigrams in Programming, ACM SIGPLAN Sept. 1982

Working...