As usual, you spectacularly missed the point and are trying to deflect the discussion. Pushing for the vaccine as the main solution is criminal and dumb, when you do not know if a vaccine can work (in 1984 "scientists" said that a vaccine for HIV would be available in two years...) and when a vaccine could take many months if not years to be available. It does not matter if this person got sick because the vaccine, what does it matter is that this constitutes a delay as the flu season nears and this kind of delays are very common (e.g. a foreseeable occurence) during vaccine trials: so, again, betting all your best resources on a working vaccine, available quickly enough to be useful this season is dumb. And criminal.

And this is why the vaccine strategy was a very bad idea to fight SARS-COV-2 in the short to medium term. All those opinion leaders, benefactors à la Bill Gates, "scientists" who pushed for a vaccine as the solution are dumb criminals. Vaccine research takes years and the outcome is uncertain, instead they all banked on a working vaccine, available much sooner than usual. That is nuts. All the money and resources spent for those vaccines should have been spent on more hospitals, more personnels, more intensive care units, better therapies: things that certainly work.

Do it, if it is good for the story and the show gets better with it. If it is just for point-scoring and virtue-signalling, better not: it would probably backfire, painting those minorities in a worse light than they are right now.

The problem is that this stuff tends to look like the parody of itself. You got "romances" that look like that old Jim Carrey's sketch, where he shouts every second or so "look, I'm gay!".

Unfortunately, since Kamala Harris is no longer attorney general of California, there is none left to fight for keeping non-violent inmates in overcrowded prison, for holding innocent people behind bars, that is for procuring $1/hour slave workforce and fighting wildfires in California.

That is the kind of mentality that brought you to this point. Then you vote for the other side, but it is just the other side of the same coin. The $3 trillion plan to give free money to the rich and crumbs to the poor was approved by the Democrat-led House.

I wonder if the bird population dropped by 70%, before they painted the blades...

China. China processed 70% of the world electronic waste, most of it was imported from the U.S.A. and the E.U., but in 2018 imposed a ban on waste import, including electronic waste. There was a long article about it and its significance on the NYT:

Those smaller nations, like Thailand, did not take much time to step up their regulations.

As for coal, well: China expands coal plant capacity to boost post-virus economy.

And yet, the poor countries that used to "recycle" those PV panels and the other electronic waste said stop with this shit, while they are still happily burning coal. Are they duped by the the evil fossil fuel industry, or do they know, because they experimented it first hand, what is really thousand times worse?

Cite The Actual Words From The Muller Report - CTAWFTMR

Is it hard to understand that he wanted the actual citations from the report and _not_ some random interpretations that fit a given narrative?
For example:

is a false statement, regarding the Muller report.

He may be 12, but, unlike you, he can understand what he reads.
I break it down for you:

It is simple: Muller specifically investigated the claims of Russian collusion, but in the end his report could not confirm them. Wikipedia did not. The DOJ guidelines neither.

So you are against freedom and democracy here. Voters must be free, independent, informed and educated (hence free speech and free press, hence public education). If you think that they miss some of those features, then you think that there cannot (or must not) be democracy here, and, as a consequence, freedom.