The vast majority of web applications are not written in C. The operating system and other underlying software is, but that's not what the OWASP paper was talking about.

My link had columns for XSS and SQL injection. I explicitly mentioned them in my reply. Aren't you tired of being so wrong about obvious things?

It depends on the vulnerability. Also, at the minimum, they often result in a crash. But the fact is that buffer overflows are resulting in exploits.

That's "The Ten Most Web Application Security Risks". Web applications. Most web applications are not written in C/C++.

If you don't eat your meat, how can you have any pudding?

You just contradicted yourself.

Or you can spare yourself a lot of pain and just move to a language where that happens by default.

Oh, really? Invalid memory issues still make up around 20%, and it's the single-highest category of security vulnerability, even more than XSS, and more than double SQL injection.

You keep blathering on about memory leaks when the topic is security and invalid memory access.

So he reinvented the wheel to get around C problems. Of course, that only "solves" one of the least harmful memory issues in C. Memory leaks will cause you to run out of memory, but they don't corrupt it like buffer overflows, use after free, etc., will.

Yes, but C/C++ suffers from all of those issues plus memory corruption.

So when are they going to indict and extradite these Australians for helping Bernie Sanders?

When are they going to indict and extradite Christopher Steele, the "ex" MI6 agent that supposedly contacted Russians to compile his "salacious and unverified" Trump dossier? When are they going to prosecute those involved from the DNC, the Clinton campaign, the Department of Justice, and the FBI?

It's funny, we're going on two years of this "Trump-Russia collusion" business, but the bulk of the evidence points to a criminal conspiracy to help the Democrats.

Yeah, it's bullshit to claim you're hiding in the UK to avoid extradition from Sweden to the US. I highly doubt the leaked sealed indictment dates to this period.

*snort* We've got tens of millions of illegal immigrants in the country. The entire state of California has become a "sanctuary" state. Children of illegal immigrants are guaranteed school and food stamps. Illegal immigrants flood hospital emergency rooms as a form of basic healthcare.

But if you want to build a wall, or Soros-forbid even deport illegal immigrants, you're a "xenophobe".

Speaking out against illegal immigration, Islam, or the latest transgender craziness gets labeled as "hate speech".

What percentage of the population are Muslims? If such a tiny percentage is even comparable to "right-wing terrorism", why would you want to import more of such a backwards ideology unfit for the modern world? What part of Islam is your favorite -- sex slaves or non-Muslims being a second-class citizen under Sharia law? Or maybe you like gays being thrown off of roofs? Go on, pretend that has nothing to do with Islam, or that all religions are equally bad.

You can't even wear a Halloween costume without some leftist wingbat at Harvard screaming in your ear.

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/1...

"George Soros, the billionaire hedge fund manager and a major Democratic donor, has given $18 billion to his Open Society Foundations, one of the largest transfers of wealth ever made by a private donor to a single foundation."

http://www.latimes.com/local/c...

"As they poured millions of dollars into district attorney campaigns, New York billionaire George Soros and other liberal donors seemed poised for victory in California.

They enjoyed the political momentum, having helped elect more than a dozen prosecutors from Florida to Texas."

https://dailycaller.com/2017/0...

"Leaked documents from George Soros' Open Society Foundations reveal how Soros works to defeat populist candidates and movements in Europe.

Soros, a U.S. citizen, uses a network of nonprofits and partner organizations across Europe to try and affect the outcomes of elections in foreign countries, the documents show.

Through advocacy efforts, education campaigns and media influencing projects, Soros does his best to affect electoral outcomes around the globe in support of his open borders worldview."

https://dailycaller.com/2016/0...

"From July 2013 to February 2015, Open Society Foundations, the network of political organizations controlled by left-wing billionaire George Soros, secretly paid the salaries of three key staffers to then-Moldovan Prime Minister Iurie Leanca, funneling the money through a German non-profit in order to skirt Moldovan laws against doing so, according to a leaked OSF document."

$18 billion buys a lot of fingers in a lot of pies. This is just a small sample.

The vast majority of Australia's population is concentrated in cities along the coasts. The United States also has population density along the coast, but it's also much more spread out in the interior. It's a bullshit comparison.

Facebook employees and tech companies in general have moved hard left. You can't wipe away the number 2 position at Facebook's email to Hillary's campaign manager just because once upon a time Thiel was brought on in 2005 and they haven't yet fired him. As I said, it's non-trivial to remove a board member.

You can't wipe away internal reports of just how intolerantly left Facebook's culture is -- even Zuckerberg admitted Silicon Valley is an "extremely left-leaning place" in testimony before Congress.

The SPLC is a far-left smear machine. Maybe you didn't notice.

Yes they are. And the article I quoted refers to public record information from Wikileak emails. Since you can't dispute the facts, you smear instead. Disgusting.

Then it should be easy for you to demonstrate. But since you're doing nothing but smearing, we know you won't.

And here you expose yourself as the propagandist you claim Daily Caller to be, by trying to align them with neo-Nazi sites. Pathetically transparent.

Yes, and? Just how much sway do you think a single board member has in the operations of Facebook? It is also non-trivial to fire a board member. And how does that change what I was refuting?

"The kind of folks who run Facebook couldn't care less which side won."