Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re: Decline linked to... (Score 1) 144

Since i started monitoring my blood sugar using one of these wonderful futuristic cyberpunk devices (it looks like a large map pin that you stick in your arms - and it does not fall off for two weeks!) I noticed that my blood sugar indeed reacts to stress.

The second important thing is that the stress can be caused by pure hard thinking about the problem for a very simple reason: brain needs only two nutrients - oxygen and sugar.

And the harder you are thinking the higher content of glucose is needed. Since in insulin resistent people you have basically have higher variation of sugar i presume that the same effect exists in normal people.

Stress is caused by simply using our brains much more than we used before.

How is stress related to male fertility? I do not know, but I think we can blamenour hypertrophic brain function as well.

Of all organs the usage of our brain changed the most dramatically since prehistoric times, isn't it?

Comment Re: How does it correlate in farmers and farm work (Score 1) 144

Thank you! This is a very reasonable argument.

Personally, I think that decline of physical activity and subsequent lack of sleep is as substantial cause of male fertility as pesticides

Sleep quality directly related to testosteron content as well which also has an effect on the ultimate number we are interested in declined number of births per women

Comment Re: What bullshit (Score 1) 120

Both are bullshits.

Humanity seriously thinks that terraforming other planets is the way to go.

"OH. NOES, we cant go to COOH 1234, it's surface average annual temperature is 16C instead of 14C!"

How about terraforming Earth?

Just think how effing idiotic is climate change hysteria.

By now Antartica is how much terraformed?

Comment what's the diff? (Score 1) 185

Private companies who are all repeating a favorite mantra of all fake defenders of free speech: "censorship is only if can be done by government, otherwise it is a freedom of peivate enterprize".

Long before this law people have been censored on online platforms in far more benign situations like political speech.

(I was site banned from reddit for saying that I hate indian culture. Not by some mod, admins reacted to some snowflake's report )

For a banned person there is almost no difference if he is banned by government or by a "private" billion-user platform. It has tremendous impact on him or his business.

The difference here is quantitative, not qualitative - it's all various degrees of censorship.

I will never write a single youtube video comment out of fear that I could be banned from google, including my email that has been there for almost 20 years now.

"Private" my sweet patootie.

Slashdot Top Deals

Never ask two questions in a business letter. The reply will discuss the one you are least interested, and say nothing about the other.

Working...