Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Somewhat (Score 1) 114

This is not at all relevant to most implementations of DH, which use prime fields of large characteristic.

Exactly. Probably more interesting is that their solution is applicable to a wider range of finite fields than recent improvements.
From the paper:

Although we insist on the case of finite fields of small characteristic, where quasi-polynomial complexity is obtained, our new algorithm improves the com- plexity of discrete logarithm computations in a much larger range of finite fields.

I see no good basis for the ScienceDaily author's leap from the paper's results to his conclusion that

Since solving this variant of the discrete logarithm is now within the capacity of current computers, relying on its difficulty for cryptographic applications is therefore no longer an option. This work is still at a theoretical stage and the algorithm still needs to be refined before it is possible to provide a practical demonstration of the weakness of this variant of the discrete logarithm. Nonetheless, these results reveal a flaw in cryptographic security and open the way to additional research. For instance, the algorithm could be adapted in order to test the robustness of other cryptographic applications.

Comment Re:Is Diffie Hellman at risk? (Score 1) 114

Actually there is no need for DH, you can create a new throwaway RSA private/public key pair on both sides, sign it with your main key, use the throwaway keys to transfer the session key then wipe the throwaway keys. The problem with this approach is that generating a new RSA key pair for every session + transferring new key + extra round trips is a really slow process compared to DH.

So how do you go about securely communicating one part of the throwaway keys to the other side so that the session key can be transferred?

Comment Re:What Level 3 can do (Score 1) 210

I need internet for streaming media, general internet access, email, cloud storage, and gaming. Only one company allows me to do that effectively and even if I did switch to a worse service I'd lose the ability to do some of those.

Oh noes! Whatever will you do? How would you survive?
No, you don't need those things. You would like to have them. You need air to breathe, water to drink, food to eat and shelter from the elements. You apparently already have the things that you need which allows you to worry about the things that you want.

Comment Re:They're nuts but right (Score 1) 1374

Same problem as, "What if your gun runs out of ammo?". How do gun owners mitigate that problem? They check their weapon regularly.

Except that rounds do not magically disappear from a loaded magazine when it sits for a month. It still goes bang when you need it to. Batteries self discharge and could leave you defenseless just when you are counting on it.

Comment Re:And they've already stopped (Score 2) 632

I understand that it can be difficult for self employed people with highly variable incomes, but most Americans don't fall into that group and should know their yearly tax liability to within a fifty dollars or so at the beginning of the tax year.

Since the tax codes and the taxation tables aren't finalized until the end of the year I've always found it difficult to predict what my end tax liability is going to be.

Comment Re:It kind of makes sense...but it doesn't (Score 2) 632

But if the money is in my possession, doesn't a fair reading of the Constitution mean they have to prove it never belonged to me?

The US Government abandoned any pretext of due process many years ago with the passing of various asset_forfeiture laws. Now they pretty much seize anything that they can and require you to prove that you obtained it legally and that you used funds that were obtained legally.

Comment Re:I don't "consume" content (Score 1) 107

Good point. But a quick sip isn't exactly something I depend on, right? That was the real point. If one source of marginally interesting information flow gets ruined, there are plenty of other things to do. My mental well-being doesn't depend on 'consumption' of what Comcast/TWC might control. Maybe I'll just take the kayak down to the river and paddle around for a bit, take the dog for a walk or take the bike out for a spin. Comcast/TWC can DIAF.

So when you go down to the local polling place, assuming that you even vote, do you just pick randomly?

Slashdot Top Deals

The best way to accelerate a Macintoy is at 9.8 meters per second per second.

Working...