The procecutor has withdrawn the warrant for arrest since there is no reason to arrest Assange and the suspicions are not of the kind that warrant an arrest.

http://www.dn.se/nyheter/sverige/assange-anhallan-havd-1.1157250

Apparently one of the women said to Aftonbladet that "it was a man with a twisted view on women and that he couldn't take a no".

http://www.aftonbladet.se/nyheter/article7652935.ab

They have issued a warrant for his arrest.

I have a 100/100 unlimited and have no idea of the amount of traffic. I don't need to.

Well, I asked for an example of an drive-by infection on Linux or OS X. I am still waiting.

The original post claimed that it isn't easier to infect Windows, i claimed the contrary. The fact is that we see drive-by infections on windows all the time.

If other OS's was equally insecure, we would see attacks directed to them as well. Vulnerabilities are there, but we don't see drive-by infections. So if you can give an example of a drive-by infection on Linux or OS X, I would concede. If you can't give such an example, you should concede that you are wrong.

I said driveby infection, not vulnerabilities

Then maybe you could give me an example of a driveby infection on Linux or OsX.

Actually, number 2 is not trolling. Windows is the only OS that support driveby.infections without interaction with the user. So it is easier to infect.

Yes, something is seriously wrong with this comparison. You compare a clean and unused operatingsystem with a fullfledged Linuxdistribution with a lot of applications.

Of course the Linuxdistribution will have more bugs, but you dont have to install all the software that comes with it. On the other hand, to be able to use the Windows server to something useful, you have to install more Microsoft and/or thirdparty software. It isnt even a webserver without installing more software in Secunias statistics. IIS has its own category.

Dont compare apples and pears, you will only fool yourself.