Because mass surveillance doesn't exist in other economic and political systems.

Wrist you believe and what actually is at two different things. There is considerable prestige in overthrowing older views. But they are not overthrown by taking money from fossil fuel companies and writing pieces in the WSJ.

Climatologists get paid whether the world is warming or cooling, and it's not as if the politicians are doing much in regards to what the scientists are saying.

Besides, there's a lot more profit in being a mouthpiece for the fossil fuel industry.

But hey, maybe you can hire Ben Stein to narrate a documentary detailing how all the biolo... er climatologists are in an evil cabal to hide the truth.

Fortunatley, they don't, and you're still either a liar or a retard. One thing is for sure, you're beneath contempt.

There are far too many sociopaths in the world, and the Internet seems to be a perfect playground for their misanthropy.

Because climatologists never use field data...

Oh wait, they do, that must me you're either a liar or a retard.

I take it you think your word salad means something.

Wake me up when that happens. For now we have a galaxy that no one thinks is older than the Big Bang which looks like it's further advanced than other galaxies of its age. That's very interesting, but it has nothing to do with your claim.

Your inability to understand what physicists are saying is not the physicists' fault.

Explosions have a center. The Big Bang did not. The Big Bang was not an explosion.

Yes, the method where you come up with models with predictive power and test them against observation, as opposed to bring a pathetic loser who grape onto kookery in the vain hope that somehow it will make your intellectual laziness seem less obvious.

I spent years debating people like you, only to learn your type are too fundamentally pompous and inadequate to actually want to learn anything.

You're ignorance of cosmology is astounding. Almost as astounding as your unearned arrogance.

Read a fucking book by an actual cosmologist and get that idiotic chip off your shoulder. You're not important enough to have one.

Explosion is an awful word because of all the semantic baggage. I prefer expansion, as does the vastr bulk of cosmologists. Inflation was also coupled with a period of supercooling, making it even less like an explosion in any classical sense.

Ignoramuses become less convincing with outrage, not more.

The Big Bang wasn't an explosion; it was a rapid expansion of all space. There is no center.