Oh come on. Even during the Blitz, Britons made jokes about the Germans. Humor is how people cope with stressful situations, and it is a hell of a lot better a way to deal with terrorist threats than running around screaming your fool head off, or worse, in some ways, become a hyper-serious worry wort believing at any moment you're going to die in some terrorist bomber's explosion.

I would have found Anne Hathaway's character's story more interesting than McConaughey's story. McConaughey's storyline is more like Frank Poole's, and about as interesting.

I thought it was a shitty rewrite of 2001. I was completely disappointed by the film. If they'd cut 30 minutes off of it, at least one could not have accused it of being overly long.

They're taking steps to fix the situation, after having been busted putting spyware on them. That doesn't exactly make them sound honorable.

I didn't mean to upset the Michael Bay fans. I know how they all think Pearl Harbor is the highest achievement in cinema history, apart from Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen.

Let's face it. If you're a Michael Bay fan, The Interview probably would come off as high art.

I watched Doomsday Machine a few months ago, and within 5 minutes I'd forgotten about the mid 60s sets and effects. The story and acting was that good.

Infants are sickly?

I have a feeling you're an undiagnosed sociopath.

"You're free to do whatever you want!"
"Great, I'm going to drive down a crowded sidewalk in a Hummer at 90mph."
"That was really stupid why did you do that, go to jail!"

You see, there's no such thing as absolute liberties.

Because children too young to be vaccinated are some sort of selfish interest group out to steal your liberties...

No, you're quite right. All that really counts is money, so providing someone is making money by not dealing with plastic trash entering waterways, that's good. Aquatic life, future generations, they don't really make us that much money, so fuck them, each and every one.

I think the point here is surface area, not volume.

Then you're children should be quarantined until such time as you agree to vaccination, and if any outbreak is ties to your children, an electric chair is awaiting you.

And the Salem hypothesis is demonstrated once again.

The issue here isn't whether you're convinced vaccines are good or not. The issue here is the insistence on an absolute right to refuse a vaccination for you and those you are a legal guardian over can have devastating effects on others. If you decide, as foolish as it may be, that vaccines are bad, and you refuse to have your children vaccinated, and there are enough of you that it compromises herd immunity, what is the recourse for those whose children are too young or for other legitimate medical reasons could not have the vaccine? Are you saying your rights outweigh theirs?