3 lines is an article now?
Also, it's "its", not "it's". You would think an editor on an English-language website would have at least a rudimentary understanding of English grammar rules.
"US-centric" != "rudimentary understanding of English"
I kid, I kid...
7 years and the UI is still shit.
UI is confusing, to say the least. But that's not my issue with it, it's UNBELIEVABLY slow to click around. *click* *wait* oops wrong option *click again* *wait* *find the right option* et cetera.
But it's very capable of what it ought to do. It's immensely big though and I prefer smaller apps for smaller tasks.
social security number = ID and citizenship check
But it needs a proof of ID, or something like that, with a photo, I guess? Like a passport? Just the plain numbers are worthless, I hope?
Alerts don't sell phones or services, so it's probably funded, staffed, and supported like anything else that doesn't contribute to profits: poorly.
Expect it to either be pwned after a few times, or "This important message is brought to you by General Motors"
karmanator has been dispatched
Hopefully it will get a bit more sinister, less shouting and running, better arcs. Can't wait till the Christmas Special
He was 41 at the time, but could have passed for younger.
Eccles was good, and very underestimated. He gave Dr Who a bit of noir. The lang black coat suited very well.
End the war on work!
http://goo.gl/Nz128
I saw that Ted Talk, one of the few that made sense, was honest, was based on facts and experience and should address the whole world. Yet half my acquaintances were convinced that Mike Rowe was blabbering. They rather heard someone talking about success than about life's realities.
Was Zimmerman's life in danger?
If you answer 'yes' or 'a reasonable person might think so' then you're still looking at it with half of your brain.
Given the circumstances which were well reported, no matter who was 'on top' or had weed in their system or was a 'racist'...Zimmerman's life was **not in danger**
His head was banged repeatedly against concrete. I'd call that life threatening. Oh wait, let me use your argument enhancing technique:
"I'd call that **life threatening**"
Of course real violence desensitizes people. No question in that.
But we are talking about virtual violence. That is completely different.
Virtual violence, like video games, do not desensitizes people to real violence. Because that one is virtual and the other is real.
A horror movie will not desensitize you. A plane crash movie will not traumatize you.
And yet the videos of the planes crashing into the World Trade Towers on 9/11 that were played over and over again, did indeed traumatize many. So evidently, some plane crash movies do traumatize people.
I fail to see how the planes crashing into the World Trade Towers is virtual violence.
Of course, they like the Cauc!
Bravo! *applauds*
How can you do 'New Math' problems with an 'Old Math' mind? -- Charles Schulz
