They just use the clues/data to backtrack alternative paths to the clues/data and claim the clues/data was obtained through those means. The original search warrant need never be mentioned in court, even though the clues/data are used.
Except that the defendant/accused isn't informed of the search warrant.
Effectively, this ruling says that NOBODY can challenge search warrants.
It exists and It's called DKIM
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
This thing was created by somebody identifying as "Offensive Application Programming Initiative".
It is obviously not meant as a serious authentication system, it just shows what is possible if we give out too much personal information.
TFA states here last interview with Google was in 2013 and the bought the farm in 2014.
These do not overlap. Her LinkedIn profile would have been different in 2013.
It may very well be that she got into dairy farming due to being jaded with the job market.
She may only be joining the case because she's no longer interrested in IT jobs (which certainly will become impossible after the case).
It's a taxi company
I can order a taxi online already. Why would a particular implementation of ordering transport online suddenly make it something completely different?
If you take away the cars, Uber no longer has anything to sell. If you take away the online app, they could switch to some other channel and continue.
The pointer moves in the direction that your mouse moves.
If you tap the top-left side of the mouse, it's called a click.
Click on the picture that looks like a button to do what the text on the button says.
This has been true ever since the earliest of GUI's.
So people want Yellow Pages?
No one wants to see ads on their wrist.
No one wants to see ads anywhere, ever.
Doesn't seem to stop the advertisers, though.
Except when your friend and family influence you, they probably don't want to sell you the worst crap possible for the highest profit margin possible.
Advertising is also morally unjustified because it actively tries to have you make the worst decission.
"we don't have any obligation to support them."
Nor do the redditors have any obligation to keep visiting the site.
This isn't about obligations, it's about ethics.
The Steve Ballmer Institute: No one knows what condition afflicts steve ballmer. Hes a man once known to hurl furniture in fits of paranoid delusion, only to emerge days later caked in sweat and howling a chant of 'developers' over and over, in a schitzophrenic episode. The Ballmer institute seeks to heal by studying and, in time, formulating a treatment for this rare and profoundly sad disease.
It's a nice idea, but their suggested treatment is just repeating the word "doctors" ad nauseum.
Obviously, for the same reasons Facebook new chief security officer wants to kill Facebook's anti-privacy defaults: None whatsoever.
Welcome students, to this course delving deep into all the science that is the foundation of homeopathy.
Let's start.
No questions?
You all get an A.
Class dismissed.
If 99% of people would no longer drive, this would reduce the risk of causing an accident, thus reducing the cost of this full medical liability insurance, in turn bringing back people onto the roads as drivers.
I wonder where the optimum would be.
If a subordinate asks you a pertinent question, look at him as if he had lost his senses. When he looks down, paraphrase the question back at him.
