Cosmonaut?

Try "confidant"

Uhhh, Dude - the reason why they are called “alpha" males is because *they are in charge*.

All that "relationship building" stuff *works*. It's like you are sneering at *gravity*.

DG

What part of "move on already" did you NOT understand?

DG

Agreed! How dare people enjoy something!

(Oh, I think Kevin Bacon may be teaching your daughter how to dance. You should probably check into that)

Act like a kid, get treated like one.

...and the simulation reported a 40% increase in property values inside the blast radius.

I had no idea the sim was that accurate.

(I kid. I kid because I love. 519 represent! )

DG

There isn't even a standardized measure of grits viscosity. How can you model pouring when there is so little consistency batch-to-batch?

DG

Eternal September wasn't an event; it's a process.

DG

Kid, he's right; you're wrong. Move on already.

DG

Non sequitur.

I could counter with the number of packets being transmitted across the entire network in a similar timeframe, or with the total number of electrons in use - but like your bone fragment example - those would be worthless metrics of complexity.

DG

It likes cats.

DG

When I drop a ball, and show that it follows the path predicted by gravitation, what more must I do to "show" that gravity caused the ball to fall.

When the atmospheric CO2 content increases and the global average temperature goes up about the amount Arrhenius said it would back in 1906 due to basic physical principles, and then I show that is in fact human emissions that caused the CO2 increase, what more must I do to "show" that global warming cause the temperature increase.

Another well named coward that doesn't understand science. Do you know what disproving global warming would get a scientist? Fame and fortune! Oil companies would have a bidding war to hire him. You know why it hasn't been done? Because global warming is real and it's happening at pretty much the rate Arrhenius predicted 107 years ago. The reasons why it is happening should be obvious to anyone who has studied the subject. The way to stop it is also obvious.

The big fame in science comes from disproof. The most referenced papers of mine are ones where I disproved theoretical claims. Every scientist wants to be the one who disproves something big.

Repost that without the lies and you'd have an empty post. I see why you post as an AC. Seriously, every statement you made there was an outright lie. Including the "No warming for 17 years" lie. Current temperatures are will withing the 95% confidence limits of the AR4 model assemblage.

Signed the Truth? You are a laugh riot. How much do you think it would cost Exxon and the Koch brothers if oil and coal production gets cut? A hell of a lot more than any bankers stand to gain from it.

Follow the money, but use your brain rather than your politics.