Centralize/Decentralize YAWN. I've seen 3 swings in 20 years of pro, myself.

I was just kidding ;) FIDO still works great.

Mister44, it doesn't matter if it's for mail or for passwords, the result is the same. It is using hacker's automation to automate blacklists. Parent is not wrong, just misstated.

>Yes, we've all seen dozens of those science fiction stories where they steal people's eyes, or cut off their fingers, or take swabs of their DNA.

Well obviously it's time to two-factor that shit. We'll need a random series of characters meeting certain criteria, and we're good to go!

Speak for yourself! I do most of my human interaction over FIDO. It's quite a bit slower (I only receive replies after a few weeks to months), but the fidelity is better than this Slashdot fad.

Clarify, video is the more passive tech obv.

Agreed, this is more of a bench mark scale capability I think. Also uses video capture, not lasers which is more passive technology.

OH damn I read this whole thread waiting for someone to nail this guy. DONE AND DONE. AC Nails it AND modded up.

Today is a good day

But then you won't buy Watch Dogs HD on Steam Sale 4 years from now...

This is absolute bullshittery. Morality is rational, it is irrational. It is codified, it is not codified. Wow, you are the weakest minded person I've met on the Internet all day- perhaps all week. Grow a pair and post as yourself too AC, if you want to talk about what morality actually is.

morality
mralt,mô-/Submit
noun
principles concerning the distinction between right and wrong or good and bad behavior.

No. Morality is about making choices for yourself and not impacting others without choice negatively. It has nothing to do with me, or what I see as clear- but apparently you need someone to follow?

Wow you're a genius. How's this. I'm pro choice- morally. Dumbass.

For the record I am VERY consistent in my application of morals here.

1) no one is hurt
2) someone is hurt
3) someone may be hurt, but that person is dead. family may be hurt, but if they are not, what is the big deal?

No you missed completely what guides my moral compass........

My moral compass is guided by accountability and impact to others outside of free will. Religious morals approach it from the ass end. They deny you free will (without irony) to serve unaccountable morals.

I think your definition of "morals" is skewed towards, my 'religious morals' versus any sort of accountable moral code which prevents people from impeding on others.

For instance, is it immoral for two men you don't know have sex? Is it also immoral for those one of those men to kill the other? Is it immoral for one of those men to marry his brother afterwards?

One of these things is morally ambiguous, one is immoral, and the other completely fucking irrelevant. But an unaccountable religious moral code would ban all three.