My initial reaction was also "WTF?", but this isn't as completely insane as you might think. I don't know if they still have them, since I haven't checked in probably 10 years, but I used to go into Hot Topic once in a while because they had a few racks of video game-themed t-shirts. So ThinkGeek isn't too far off from stuff that they at least used to have in the stores.
It'll all depend on how much overlap they attempt to force. If they leave the 'alternative' an emo/goth counterculture stuff mostly out of Thinkgeek and don't try to waste retail space in Hot Topic and Torrid with stuff that doesn't appeal to their customers then they might be fine. If they turn Thinkgeek into a bastion of Nightmare Before Christmas merchandise and attempt to use the modern not-geek fad of the term geek with a bunch of plastic junk that doesn't appeal then we might have a problem.
I've shopped from both businesses, but not for the same reasons. If they keep them mostly separate and then it may work well, otherwise it could turn into a crappier version of Spencer's Gifts.
We may end up with intuitive and user-friendly software, oh no!
So, I don't care which shade of pastel and crayons the useless interface is. I want to turn off the useless interface entirely, because it provides nothing in the way of utility.
Windows 8.1 is fast and stable, and has nice features. But it's only usable as a desktop once you install something like Classic Shell and turn off the crap that these "designers" have put in.
They're spending all the time tweaking the wrong things.
I think it's hilarious when Windows 95 icons are more intuitive than an OS that'll literally be twenty years later from the same company. That was with icons that only had the basic sixteen ANSI colors available to them at-launch. It required an update to enable 256-color icons. If anything, limiting designers to those sixteen colors and requiring a common faux-3d paradigm ensured that all of the icons had a design consistency about them that made it difficult for others to copy, so one could usually tell if a program was a Microsoft one versus a third-party.
There's been a lot to dislike about Microsoft over the years, but historically their user interfaces were legitimately not on that list. These 'advances' are changing that.
Those "screenshots" are only 600x375. They're more on the side of being huge thumbnails than actual screenshots.
Unless of course you're still using a 640x480 display, in which case you're seeing an article from the future. Hello from the future! Buy these things called "Bitcoins", they'll be worth hundreds of dollars some day!
Heh. Given how the icons are looking more like icons did in the days of Windows 3.1, maybe having a low-res screen is next. The Hipsters will love it!
Overload -- core meltdown sequence initiated.