> the most annoying sound in the world (Joan Rivers' voice)
Joan Rivers is definitely in the top ten, but I think a St. Bernard with a hairball is worse.
Look at Qualitex again, though. The green-gold color is arbitrary. The only reason it's able to be trademarked is because it has acquired a secondary meaning. The same would apply here - if the tour company is associated with these duck sounds enough, the sounds may have acquired a secondary meaning.
Any injunction against use would also only apply to other tour companies, not people using duck calls in general. (Though with trademark dilution, its possible that related business areas would be encompassed as well)
Well, maybe, except what leverage does Google have against Sony? "You darn well better load up our browser, or we'll......" We'll what? What is Google going to do to Sony that would hurt Sony?
We all know the actual means of monetizing of this... your vibrator will tweet when it turns on.
Actually, I should rephrase that. The vibrator will tweet. It's never *your* vibrator, of course.
Doesn't matter. As long as it turns on the webcam(s) anyway.
I'd suggest you're in the minority with a preference for having no browser at point of delivery, rather than just the wrong browser.
Much of the rest of the crap I agree with you on, there's a whole load of crap I'll never need. But a browser is something I just expect to have on a new, complete, system and I'm quite prepared to change it if it's the 'wrong' one. I think I'm in the majority here.
I call it 'getting together with them for drinks....'
Interesting. Is that patented?
Such loops are almost certainly buggy
[citation needed]
That seems a bit redundant. You just cited him, didn't you? I get the strangest feeling of recursion when someone quotes somebody else and asks for a citation...
"Sometimes insanity is the only alternative" -- button at a Science Fiction convention.