Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Hmmm. (Score 1) 389

Nobody likes having their ideas dismissed as dumb. It also annoys the hell out of me how dismissive people can be of the way others are treated. A person being told to do things under threat of physical detainment and imprisonment is pretty harsh. I find it highly offensive that anyone would condone threatening another person with such violence without a damned good reason.

Lock up the child molesters, murderers, and rapists. Punish thieves, and fraudsters. However, they are locking up farmers and flower peddlers, non-violent people, who do nothing but provide a product that they believe in, and their customers want. That I can't support and I am sickened that you or anyone else can.

If it doesn't piss you off, you are part of the problem.

-Steve

Comment Re:Makes me wonder (Score 1) 884

China may have a few "ooh aaah" projects, better cell phonse and more flat screen TVs, but after living here for 8 months, I don't agree with your conclusion. It isn't fair to cherry pick one or two examples, when they are unique and not characteristic of the average. You mentioned the maglev train. Well that is nice and fancy, but how many Chinese cities have even regular metro systems? Beijing, Shanghai, Shenzhen, Xiang Gang and Chongqing, IIRC. How many US cities have metro systems? New York, Boston, DC, Atlanta, Baltimore, Los Angeles, San Francisco, Cleveland, Chicago, Philadelphia and Miami. Possibly more I'm forgetting. So maybe the shiniest tech in Shanghai is impressive, but if you average it out with what the lack of technology in most places, I still think the US comes out ahead.

Comment Re:Can everybody swallow the blue pill? (Score 1) 133

I'm living in China right now. I just asked my 23 year old Chinese girlfriend if most people know about the Tiananmen Square riots, and she said "everyone knows, but we don't know the details, like how many people were killed." From my (admittedly short) time living in China, my analysis of Chinese knowledge of their government's actions is this: I think Chinese hear the big stories, like how the Sichuan schools were poorly constructed. On the other hand, they don't hear about all the little things, like how the Chinese government recently gunned down five Uighur "terrorists", or how they sentenced someone who posted pictures of schools that fell in the earthquake to one year of forced labor without a trial, etc, etc.

Oh, and a lot of the ones I talk to know about proxies, but don't care enough--or are too lazy--to circumvent the firewall. I mean, if you'd never used Wikipedia, then Wikipedia being blocked isn't such a big deal, since you don't know what you're missing. (Wikipedia is just an example, as it has worked in China for a few months now I think.)
The Courts

RIAA Afraid of Harvard 425

NewYorkCountryLawyer writes "According to a report on p2pnet.net, the RIAA's latest anti-college round of "early settlement" letters targets 7 out of 8 Ivy League schools, but continues to give Harvard University a wide berth. This is perhaps the most astonishing display of cowardice exhibited to date by the multinational cartel of SONY BMG, Warner Bros. Records, EMI, and Vivendi/Universal (the "Big Four" record companies, which are rapidly becoming less "big"). The lesson to be drawn by other colleges and universities: "All bullies are cowards. Appeasement of bullies doesn't work. Standing up to bullies and fighting back has a much higher success rate.""
Music

Submission + - Radiohead allows fans to decide on price 2

radicalskeptic writes: "Radiohead, a band known to be unhappy with other music download services, has decided to release their next album, "In Rainbows", in two formats: a £40 boxed set and a digital download. What's the catch? Customers who purchase the digital download are able to name their own price for the album. This is the first Radiohead release since their contract with EMI expired. As "The Majors" continue to lose relevance, can we expect more of this type of experimentation and flexibility from independent artists?"

NASA Study Shows Antarctic Ice Sheet Shrinking 407

deman1985 writes "A recently released NASA study has shown that the Antarctic ice shelf is shrinking at an alarming rate of 36 cubic miles per year. The study, run from April 2002 to August 2005, indicates that the melting accounted for 1.2 millimeters of global sea level rise for the period. From the article: 'That is about how much water the United States consumes in three months and represents a change of about 0.4 millimeter (0.01575 inch) per year to global sea level rise, the study concluded. The study claims the majority of the melting to have occurred in the West Antarctic ice sheet."

Slashdot Top Deals

Always draw your curves, then plot your reading.

Working...