why would anyone trust an anti-counterfeiting method from the chinese... a country that thrives on stealing state and industrial secrets, theft of intellectual property and trademarks, the piracy of all kinds of products and media, and manufacturing of counterfeit goods?
Because unlike people living in the ghetto like you, science doesn't discriminate?
Association by nationality doesn't make someone a criminal.
I flew both cargo and carrier based aircraft in the 90s, in the US and abroad.
You are aware that in aviation things are continue to improve, right? One of those things is phraseology.
transmits to the booth as: Do it -static- do it -static- kill everyone!
Something vaguely similar actually happened, killing 500+ people. In 1977, two 747s collided on the runway in part due to miscommunication.
ICAO phraseology has since been changed to use separate terminology for positive and negative communications. For example, when an ATC controller asks whether or not your capable your aircraft is capable of maintaining straight and level flight at a speed of 80 knots, the pilot will not say "I don't think we can do that" or "we can not do that". He or she will say "Affirmative" or "negative".
Takeoff clearings are even more different. When ready to take off, a pilot will advice "ready for departure" and will only use the word takeoff when reading back a clearance (i.e. Delta 19 cleared for expedited takeoff rwy 19).
In France
where the same guys ban wi-fi.
Yes, those flat-earthers...
Wrong!
Where exactly am I wrong? A presidential TFR is issued by the FAA in a NOTAM, and so are all other TFRs (which is something completely different than a Restricted Area, like the airspace over camp pendleton).
A TFR always follows the President (TFR POTUS designation)
Total bullshit again. They are designated Temporary flight restrictions for VIP Movement.
Have a look at tfr.faa.gov.
Many cities already ban news flights over them and have done so for years
I call total bullshit on this.
First of all, cities are unable to ban anything, it is the FAA that sets up no-fly zones. Second, if there are no-fly zones, they would be documented as restricted areas on sectional charts. You show me any sectional FAA approved chart that specifically forbids news flights, and I shall eat the dust from underneath your shoes.
Even NYC has most of its airspace as open (class B and C). As long as flights maintain the proper altitude (usually at least 1000ft AGL), everyone holding a private pilot's certificate can fly there.
Yet another reason to watch movies at home.
I haven't been in a movie theater in at least 4 years and can't say I miss them. Overpriced tickets, grossly overpriced undercooked popcorn, nasty people who call/text/fax/mail halfway through the movie and idiots bringing kids.
I'll wait until it's either on Netflix, Amazon instant, or The Pirate Bay.
The gov't should assume the responsibility for the massive infrastructure required to build the backbone.
Ah yes, with fibertaps everywhere.
No thanks.
But with internet bandwidth, you have have overflow connections that are sitting dark and if needed just light them up and data will be flowing within seconds. This can even be automated. As traffic starts to fall off, turn those connections off.
This has got to be the biggest bullshit I have ever heard.
Sabri
JNCIE #261
shutup. just shut the fuck up. you neither know you are talking about, nor have any valid point to make.
Perhaps you should consider moving back to Mother Russia, since you seem to appreciate the socialist state.
I for one welcome an opposing opinion.
I think that if we've learned anything form the Ham vs Nye debate, it is that belief and science are two different things. One will be changed with arguments, the other can't.
In other words: religion is not an opinion.
Overflow on /dev/null, please empty the bit bucket.
