I wish Matrox would drop the price of the Parhelia. I really, really want to support Matrox with my money, but I can't do so when they price their cards so astronomically high. Actually, I can't remember a Matrox card that wasn't expensive. But $350? That's insane. How can the Parhelia possibly still cost that much money?
Wait a minute. I was going to say, "I need a new video card", not go on about Matrox. Maybe I should change the subject to "Matrox is crazy".
You know, I should be the CEO of half the tech companies in Silicon Valley. Or, at least, a VP. Maybe a member of the board. Ahh, chairman of the board. That sounds good. Yes, well. I meant to say, "These stupid Silicon Valley companies are stupid." Yes, yes, I know Matrox is Canadian. But they're a stupid tech company. They can be a honorary Silicon Valley company for the sake of this point. The point is, they're all stupid. What the hell is wrong with all these companies? They're releasing overpriced products that are too little, too late. This whole faster, faster, faster thing is dumb, too. What ever happened to better? I'd rather have a better processor than a faster processor. Same thing with a hard drive. I'd rather have a better hard drive than a bigger hard drive. Better -- as in, "it doesn't suck". Intel's hyperthreading is pretty damn cool. It's an actual innovation, rather than racing to a magical number, like 1000 MHz. ooooh, we got to 1000 MHz first! Ehh, so what.
I need a new video card. The only choices today seem to be Nvidia and ATI. I guess you could include SiS, VIA/S3, Intel, and Matrox, but none of them are particularly relevant if you want to play games. Nobody uses an SiS video card willingly.
Right now, I have a ATI Radeon LE. That's said to be about the speed of a Radeon 7200 or 7500. Not very fast, compared to today's hardware. And, more importantly, it's only DX7. I want a DX8.1 or DX9 video card. Ugh. Looking at the prices, that's going to set me back at least $120 for a retail ATI card or $150 for a retail Nvidia (Asus) card. Going OEM is certainly nothing I'm afraid of doing, but the last few video cards I bought were all OEM. They all had features missing. I'm getting tired of that. I want to have everything in the chipset enabled, rather than going to enthusiast web sites and learning what registry entries to hack or downloading hacked firmwares. Ugh.
So, the choices boil down to a Radeon 9000/9500/9700 or a Nvidia GF4 4200/4400/4600. We can strike the 9700 and 4600 from the list automatically, as they are way overpriced. That leaves us with the Radeon 9000/9500 and GF4 4200/4400. The Radeon 9000 is said to be pretty damn slow (slower than a Radeon 8500), even the Radeon 9000 Pro. I'm not really sure I want a cheesy video card. All the other boys might laugh at me and my sluggish video card. On the other hand, the 9000 (non-Pro) sells for an amazingly low price of $65-$75 (around the same price as my Radeon LE). We're talking really slow, here. And, this is the OEM Sapphire version. Ugh. It's not even built by ATI. Well, it certainly could be worse. It'd be an upgrade from my current card. I really dislike the idea of buying such a crippled video card, but beggars can't be choosers, right? Hmmm. For just a little more money, I could buy the retail 9000 Pro ($120). Maybe it's worth buying the retail 9000 Pro, just to avoid going with Sapphire. I just don't trust them. On the other hand, I could have a Sapphire 9500 (non-Pro) for just $150. Very tempting. That'd give me DX9 support! Very cool, indeed. Yet, would it be any faster than a 9000 Pro? I'm not sure that an OEM 9500 non-Pro would actually be any faster...
Or I could just buy a damn Nvidia card, like everyone else on the planet.
I'm not quite sure. I mean, I don't play FPSs all that much. I mostly go with the slower-paced games. I want awesome visuals, like what the back of the Morrowind box promised. I'm sick of seeing blurry screens. I want 4X anti-aliasing (or even better!).
This doesn't seem too much to ask. Say, 1280x1024 with 32 bit color and 100 Hz or 120 Hz refresh rate. Maybe 1600x1200 at 85 Hz, if my poor eyes can handle that. I remember the days I could stare at a 60-72 Hz screen for hours at a time. Oh well. Getting old sucks.
So, what should I do? Should I settle for a cheesy 9000 Pro and save my money for better things, like lots of pizza? I probably wouldn't get any benefit out of a 9500 or comparable GeForce card, anyways. Hmmm. Too bad I don't have $350 for the Parhelia.