Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:flaw (Score 2, Informative) 323

There are legal processes for protecting against shenanigans like that - lawsuits intended solely to mire the defendant in paper would fall under vexatious litigation, I believe.

Turn it around - someone with a ligitimate complaint would be unable to proceed with it if the defendant stuck his fingers in his ears and went "LA LA LA I can't HEAR YOU"... Default judgments mean that you can't just run away from a suit, you have to face it and deal with it.

See also http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vexatious_litigation

Comment Re:Why? Just standardization? (Score 1) 479

During the early 00s nobody cared about anything else than IE because there was no decent alternative (Netscape was hell at the time), so, anything written/acquired back then only really supported IE. Rather than spend money on making it work with newer browsers, the companies decided that they'd just set IE6 as a requirement and force companies to either pay for costly migrations to more modern software, or keep IE6 installed.

Comment Re:Taking out capital ships? (Score 2, Interesting) 618

However, the threat scenario with Club-K missiles (according to TFA) is not a "shooting war between first world powers". The concern is that if a terrorist organization were to get these missiles, they could sneak up on a warship that doesn't know it's at war. Your step 1 is already solved if you have a ship within visual range.

Not sure what you do about step 3, though. Also not sure why it's more likely that terrorists get these than any other Russian weapon.

Slashdot Top Deals

What good is a ticket to the good life, if you can't find the entrance?

Working...