I've never ever experienced a Hot Pocket that was anything less than flesh-searing hot on the inside.
That said, TLDR: Energy is supplied to the outside faster than it can be conducted to the inside of the food.
I'm too lazy to count, but I'm pretty sure that would fit in a tweet, and hopefully it was a "no shit" situation for 99% of people with brains. Essentially it's the same reason a steak can be burnt on the outside and raw on the inside.
Security systems might be worthwhile for your own safety, but not for protecting against burglary. Unless you're very lucky, response times pretty much guarantee anyone will be in and out before the police have even dispatched a unit.
What you need isn't security; it's insurance. It's cheaper than monitored security systems, more dependable, and doesn't suffer from the risks of technical failures or circumvention (though ignoring it is more likely than circumvention). In the event of a burglary, your things will be replaced. (Make sure your policy covers replacement cost, not depreciated market value). And keep your important data backed up!.
(Disclaimer: YMMV, and selecting a policy requires due diligence.)
If it ain't broke, fix it till it is!
No, wait, that was an idiot. An idiot said that.
Sorry, Google. I like you, and I want to respect your decisions, but I got nothing.
I'm anti-masturbation for much the same reason. If 47 chromosomes are people, then so are 23! Menstruation is obviously murder as well! (Why else would it be so bloody?)
Come to think of it, I'm anti-not masturbating as well! Reabsorbing chromosomes is murder!! Oh, the humanity!
Get off the soapbox. We have no moral superiority, and we don't even rank that high in freedom of the press. We're below the UK FFS.
It does in the US. Parents aren't responsible for criminal activities of their children, and minors cannot engage in contracts. Don't know how things work in the UK, but it would seem there are differences.
I do not want my car grinding to a halt because the police are looking for some runaway or a bank was robbed.
GLWT.
The difference between theory and practice is often much smaller in theory than in practice.
Wait, are you implying that some of these walls are missing and/or faulty?
pushing a product on the public with the hope that it will be useful once we have it is a cruel inversion of how product adoption should be handled.
Nonsense. People buy a product like a game console speculating that they will get future use out of it. This doesn't always pan out, as many second and third-gen consoles can demonstrate quite well. You can certainly make the argument (and I believe the author has) that the XBone raises the risk too high, and that's a valid point, but the only inversion going on here is the one between reality and wishful thinking.
You know what's been increasing (far faster than the population) for 40 years?
The problem is that angry customers don't much matter when said angries have little or no alternative.
Umm, no need to be alarmed (nervous laugh), but you may want to get that looked at. The, ah, propaganda bullshit sirens were explicitly designed to be installed outside of the head, and as you may notice, they are not going off as you read this.
Like it or not, and despite rationalizations and protests to the contrary, the criminal justice system probably exists primarily to serve the emotional need for fairness. http://www.slate.com/articles/...
What's more cruel, caging chickens, or pricing food out of reach of the poor? While I acknowledge that it doesn't have to be a dichotomy, I would suggest that eliminating human starvation is a higher priority than deciding whether chickens are sad (but obviously not starving) and if so, how to remedy that.
If you want to put yourself on the map, publish your own map.
