Seriously - with components anyone can buy and software anyone can obtain, I could build multiple types of killer robot in my garage.

Then again, I can also make all sorts of other very dangerous things. And I could drive my car down the boardwalk on a sunny day and probably kill dozens easily, hundreds with a bit of effort.

You mostly don't have to worry about that because typically we're not trying to kill each other, and the occasional unhinged person who is tends to either give a lot of warning or muck up the job.

Thanks for that - as is often the case with these competitions I think it's more about the art than the truly practical, but they're fascinating nonetheless.

And I tend to agree that centralized production of components for on-site assembly will be more efficient. We're not quite done with humans yet, though I expect one day it's going to be a flatpack and a pair of humanoid robots that result in a home.

The "Pro-Palestinian" protesters always seem to come with significant numbers of "kill Jews" protesters.

The Venn diagram isn't a perfect circle, but it's close enough that if I were running a college I'd have informed the participants that their gatherings were banned as soon as the first, sadly inevitable, antisemitic hate crime happened and had a zero-tolerance "you're out, no refund, no returning... and if you didn't belong here in the first place, say hello to the nice officer and enjoy your gift of metal bracelets" policy.

Nah, that was just a flex so Ivanka could get a patent deal on the cheap.

There are some legitimate complaints for both sides - China is not a free country and can compete in many areas with a manufactured advantage. The US is not known for honesty and integrity in trade, and will often use political, economic, or military muscle to dominate rather than try to compete compete on a level playing field.

If I'm going to choose one over the other, it is going to be the US, but neither one is 'the good guy' here.

This isn't "they have a major agitprop channel to our population", it's not "they have a major electronic spy network deployed", and it's not "they can compromise our infrastructure".

This one is, "they might start building their own and stop paying us royalties, so we need to hamstring them ASAP".

I mean, it's historically accurate American foreign policy, but it's still wrong and a lot more difficult than the TikTok ban to justify while claiming the high road.

At this point, I would be kind of interested in seeing a robot that could be parked between a load of lumber and a concrete slab and assemble a wood frame house. I'm sure the building techniques would have to be adjusted as wouldn't be sending in humans who could manipulate things on the interior after the next wall or a roof went on. Then again, until you've put up drywall or the exterior maybe you could just have a combination of clever design and a clever robot to reach through.

And there's nothing stopping that same robot from installing wiring and plumbing.

Because the ulterior motive might just be to have the capacity to knock out everyone else's space-based infrastructure without any fear of the same happening to them.

Sure, they lose a hunk of GLONASS, but they could seriously degrade Starlink, for instance.

Which is actually more interesting, because given what we know of the current state of Russia since the invasion of Ukraine... a move by Russia for a more expansive ban is almost certainly because they can't compete any longer and want to have their opponents hobble themselves.

I'm all for fewer weapons out there, the Russian proposal is obviously not an honest one.

Well... I'm sure you can figure it out.

"I got caught, they have evidence... I'm just going to call them all liars!"

That works in politics (sadly), not science.

You? No. But it might tell the Chinese government about things like troop movements or when a prominent politician is home.

It's surprising how much usable Intel can be extracted from what looks like garbage data. The real issue is the collecting and processing of so much data to effectively extract that useful data.

In fact, smarter people may have to start playing dumb, as solving a captcha too quickly can be a sign it is being done by a bot.

Of course, the counter is adding in a human response profile, applying the correct delay and randomization to match what bot-detectors are using to determine 'humanness'.

What they're doing is banning nudes, with consent or not and for everyone, because some will abuse the capability.