> identifiable features only a certain demographic regularly chooses to produce

Whoa, what do you have in mind? Oxford commas? Jive?

If you can't identify a high-correlation signal by hand, then it does not matter.

You can only make this argument AHEAD OF TIME. You don't get to pick your data, train the AI, peek at the output of the trained AI, and then say, golly jeepers, I don't like the political implication of the results, so let's do-over. At that point, YOU are introducing an overt, explicit bias.

I mean you can, but that's politics, not science. If you want to do science, you pick your protocol ahead of time, and let it lead you where it may.

Then the AI system is "biased" against identifiable features which a member of ANY demographic may choose to produce.

Ah it's the stupid old Google Algorithmic Unfairness thing yet again. Unless the AI system gets input about the demographic identity group(s) of the essay authors, this claim physically cannot be true. It cannot be biased against something it does not know.

"and that lawlessness has caused multiple tragic deaths. Even if 8chan may not have violated the letter of the law ..."

Both those things cannot be true.

> You are being funny, but different races do have different body types.

In the current year, it is well known that race is a social construct, and that there are no differences between them whatsoever.

> Women still tend to live longer than men,

We must immediately correct the gender lifespan gap.

"crypto" has only recently become synonymous with "cryptocurrency"

Back in the dark ages of the 1990s, it meant "cryptography".

Sharing ... designs ... is illegal?

On what planet? The same one where you'd defend crypto software, even though bad people can do bad things with it?

Well of course. There is nothing wrong with making 3d-printed guns, and no authority to "stop" the information flow in the USA.

mod parent up