Comment Re:Overly done graphic (Score 1) 187
Looks like the whole FA is just an ad for a wannabe data processing company.
Looks like the whole FA is just an ad for a wannabe data processing company.
How much if it is due to countries making things illegal, which pushes up the value of that item, which in turn encourages criminals to produce said item?
That's your government's way of creating jobs. But like most trade deals, it creates the jobs and increases the GDP in other countries, and drives the trade deficit way up.
"In most cities, the vast majority of violence takes place on just a few street corners, at certain times of the day, and among specific people."
This literally sounds like the easiest policing job ever if they know all this...
Better yet, some tech-savvy entrepreneur could use the data to make a tour guide, so you could go see people kill each other in quaint places. Kind of like eco-tourism... nature red in tooth, claw, switchblade, and machinegun.
The idea that everyone needs to be able to write code is nonsense. This is just propaganda to support the "need" for more visas.
It's a CRISIS, I tell you! But fortunately we can spend the next 20 years importing labor for the jobs we can't export, while you fix the school system and kids work their way through it.
When you combine time cube theory with electric universe theory you get a cubic universe plus an electric clock. The cubic universe is flat (in the cosmological sense), so if the two underlying theories are correct then the universe diverges from flatness by the amount of one electric clock.
However, pedantically speaking, that's "plus one electric clock per universe". So in the case of a multiverse, the theorem only indicates the average. But with judicious application of the Central Limit Theorem, the Pauli Exclusion Principle, the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle, and a line of reasoning left as an exercise for the reader, we can confidently conclude the universe is probably approximately flat, for definitions of "confidently", "conclude", "the universe", "is", "probably", "approximately", "flat", and "definitions" which remain to be derived from first principles.
Read more about it on my blog, Starts with a Bump on the Head, which, as you may have guessed from the title, is written in atrophic dactylic tetrameter, like all good cosmological monographs and comic books.
Your basic unit of flatness can't be zero or infinite, so Kansas will do just fine.
It's no different in any field. Experience counts.
I never understand why people consider it news when someone takes a position that is 100% predictable given who they are.
perl is a write-only language. It's *supposed* to be incomprehensible gibberish.
We kept the Shah in power for our own interests
s/kept/put/
In 1953 they had a democratically elected, very westernized government. The US and UK staged a coup when that government wasn't generous enough with "our" oil.
Worked out about as well as all our other efforts to tell the rest of the world how to run their countries.
What could POSSIBLY go wrong?
I dunno, maybe they'll get nukes and the warmongers will have to find another country to bomb?
Or, who knows, maybe we could get attacked by Saudi-sponsored terrorists again?
What's good for Disney is good for America. Or at any rate, good for the Americans who matter.
I recently read that Southern California Edison replaced its whole 500-strong IT staff with H1Bs. However, details are scarce. Several US senators have called for an investigation, but the feds are refusing on the grounds that no one hurt by it filed a complaint.
The US economy is screwed anyway. The H1B saga is just one more issue in the decades-long trend of converting the economy into shareholders and people who flip burgers for shareholders. Once the rich have skimmed all the cream, they'll go find another country to screw - or at least one that actually makes stuff they can buy with their winnings.
A) What were you doing you could be replaced that easily?!
In my experience, upper management's views on who is easily replaceable don't usually conform very well to reality.
An earlier version of this general effort used language that would forbid reference to models in policymaking.
Presumably written by some clown club that doesn't know that models are what science produces. They were transparently trying to outlaw use of the computer models that climate science relies so heavily on. (And other branches of science, but climate science is the branch that's driving corruption^w campaign donations right now.)
The link went to an article which mentioned research on CCD done at Montana State U (where I was once upon a time a biochemistry/microbiology double major) and U of MT. Didn't find a link to the actual paper offhand but didn't look that hard either; no doubt you can find it.
If the aborigine drafted an IQ test, all of Western civilization would presumably flunk it. -- Stanley Garn