Comment Re:Sigh... (Score 1) 789
They don't. If they did, they'd have already threatened Russia with them to make them stop. That's the point of having nuclear weapons, after all.
I guess you haven't seen Dr. Strangelove
They don't. If they did, they'd have already threatened Russia with them to make them stop. That's the point of having nuclear weapons, after all.
I guess you haven't seen Dr. Strangelove
No chance, really?
Ukraine was for a while (until they voluntarily gave them up) one of the most significant nuclear powers in the world. If things really got nuclear who's to say they didn't still save a few around, or couldn't build a few in a matter of months. It would only take a few high yield warheads to take out a significant fraction of the Russian economy and government in the blink of an eye...
Which gender bias is that, given I am of the gender I am making fun of?
But I guess on
Yep, that's what I was thinking. Also a seemingly inherent need to pontificate about any random philosophy, statistics, or trivia they may or may not actually be experts on.
Really, this should have been completely obvious to anyone who posts on slashdot (not to mention the gender gap here makes Wikipedia look like a bridal shower in comparison).
Weirdly, your incoherent/drunken/moronic post almost seems to be proof that humans "evolved better mothers from taking care of the infants". Can't think of another explanation. Are you *still* in your mother's basement or is she just paying your rent?
The evolutionary reality is even simpler that that (though the achievement of those is clearly not). The three main factors are:
1. be able to reproduce
2. be able to attract/acquire a mate
3. be able to care for/protect offspring long enough for them to reach #1
Clearly if it was just up #1 we would still be living alongside the rest of the primates. #2 can be a fairly complex social interaction - but insects are just as capable of it as humans. #3 is where the whole thing explodes, and is the key to investing all of those resources into the brain (and is what made it more evolutionarily advantageous to extend the time to #1 and #2).
Though of course in modern human society, social and technological advancement in #3 has so outpaced the first two that they barely seem to matter, and is why we are basically blowing past any "natural" population control. Our brains are letting us find clever ways of surviving and stripping the planet of resources, but unless we figure out a way to expand beyond the planet or stop using its finite resources we'll go through the same collapse seen in any other species going through a population explosion...
Mandatory patches are ok if they are properly managed. Xbox does 2 per year and they generally add a bunch of useful features. Sony randomly releases mandatory patches a half dozen times or more a year, and once in a while even every few weeks...
No, action is synonym for porn.
How was it legal? He stole people's property.
So, bitcoins are now property that you can steal?
Please show me a law that shows bitcoins are any more real or worth any more than virtual gold in World of Warcraft.
Well, I do agree with you the media is as much to blame as any talking heads spewing the misinformation (just not that we should give the original sources a pass).
The problem is same as with global warming, evolution, or other fringe non-scientific alternative opinions. The media tries to "balance" the argument by providing equal coverage of both sides when in reality the actual evidence/voices/etc are overwhelmingly in favor of one side (skip to 3:20 if you just want the punchline...)
Also, what TFA did point out but the summary didn't is that even if the immunization had reduced effectiveness, most cases would be less severe in someone who has been vaccinated, which can be the difference between a very annoying illness and a life-threatening one.
She's still promoting unsubstantiated FUD about vaccinations, she has just switched her focus from autism to "toxins".
http://www.slate.com/blogs/bad...
"Yet as doctors say, dosage makes the poison. The amount of, say, formaldehyde in a typical vaccination is much less than you’d get eating an apple. The same can be shown for the other ingredients claimed to be toxins in vaccines as well. The truth is vaccines contain far too small a dose of any of these things to cause any of the problems McCarthy and other anti-vaxxers claim exist.as doctors say, dosage makes the poison.
Also, botulinum is the single most lethal toxin known to humans. Yet McCarthy has enthusiastically praised injecting this toxin into her face. How can anyone possibly say that and also say vaccines have dangerous levels of toxins in them with a straight face?"
Yeah, totally. America has never had much luck with its space program!
Eh, I think "Tesla will not initiate patent lawsuits against anyone who, in good faith, wants to use our technology" was pretty clear. Of course they are going to bring the lawyers in and codify it all, etc. I'm sure it will be the pretty standard "you don't sue us we won't sue you kind of thing" plenty of other companies have already done. This was a blog post, not a legal document...
In fact, RTFA and not just the two sentence quoted in the summary, and said clearer statement is already there
It's later than you think, the joint Russian-American space mission has already begun.