Article says
Ralph Langner, a researcher who conducted an in-depth analysis of Stuxnet after the malware’s existence came to light, noted that “a water pump cannot carry a copy of Stuxnet”.
Indeed, I wonder how it moved laterally from the water pump. Was it a connected water pump? What fool would grant network access to a water pump in a nuclear facility?
"visionOS begins with a lowercase v, even when it's the first word in a sentence." The terms should never be translated or transliterated
How should it be inserted in RTL writing?
It is nice to prove software, it will fix bugs.
However, mathematically proved software runs on hardware, and hardware follows the laws of physics, where many things cannot be proven. Rowhammer attacks are there to remind us of the limits of proven software.
Linux is the "only OS to support a diagonal monitor mode (...)"
BSD systems can do it too, you insensitive clod.
I agree 10 minutes is not enough to gather hard facts. Even 24 hours is often too short for that.
But I doubt it is designed as a prosecution tool. Do they really need that to proceed with unfair prosecution?
[Unions are] pushing back on an effort by companies to get permission for 12-hour work days,
People refuse to spend their whole life, and even death, at work, and WSJ dares to call that business unfriendly.
What would this comprehensive privacy law look like? We believe it must include these components:
A strong comprehensive data privacy law promotes privacy, free expression, and security. It can also help protect children, support journalism, protect access to health care, foster digital justice, limit private data collection to train generative AI, limit foreign government surveillance, and strengthen competition. These are all issues on which lawmakers are actively pushing legislation—both good and bad.
Make sure your code does nothing gracefully.