France does not show up in the picture, despite a high ranking GDP.
Does its 80% of electricity production from nuclear weight that much, that it cancels other contributions such as road transport? Or does the study fails to take the whole picture into account?
It if funny to find Stakhanov like celebrated workers in the US
I refuse to believe this paragraph was written by a living, breathing human
I am happy to see I am not alone scratching my head after reading this thing.
not likely something that would happen in only a few generations, or even a few thousand.
But how long is a generation for the HIV?
That said, if somebody does get infected with HIV while on this drug, they should completely abstain from sex, or else it's back to the drawing board.
If that is a requirement, it is doomed to fail, but why should people abstain?
Can somebody explain the biochemistry on that?
Usually, nucleus DNA gets transcripted into RNA. HIV takes the path backwards (this is reverse-transcription) and use specific biochemistry for that. The drug attacks that pathway.
I guess it must be effective to a much larger class of virus, but don't worry: they will adapt. After all there is no real need to infect the nucleus, RNA is enough for some viruses, ad far as I understand
Because if I can get away with murder, that necessarily implies that there is "no political community able to enforce [laws against murder]"
There are several cases to distinguish
If it is not known your are the murderer, then you get away with it, but the sovereign will to ban murders remains intact. Just surrender and you will verify it is.
If you manage to flee to a foreign country (without extradition treaties) and get known as the murderer, then you experience the territoriality of sovereignty. A political community can only enforce laws on the territory it controls
If you are a known murderer you can carry on your everyday life in a given society, this indeed means that this society does not seriously care about banning murder. There may be a law, but obviously it got obsoleted by the lack of sovereign will to enforce it. I would not want to live in such a place.
So then murder is OK so long as I can successfully get away with it. Got it.
When did I say such a thing? You seems a bit confused about what sovereignty is.
Common sense says that nothing can be advertised as unlimited, because nothing on Earth is unlimited.
Stupidity has no limits
With all the industrial food wrapped into plastic containers, human also eat plastic, since almost all plastic leak chemical into the food.
Polyethylene and polypropylene may be the exceptions, but they always come with other chemicals that improve color or plasticity.
The Constitution didn't create a "freedom of speech", it's protecting one that pre-exists.
There is no natural right, because there is no natural force able to enforce such a right. Right, or laws, are created by human groups that are ready to enforce them on a given territory.
The point is everyone has the freedom of speech.
This is a US constitutional right, not a natural, or even universally accepted right. Many countries restrict it, for reasons you could consider good (ban holocost denial), or bad (ban criticism of the Great Leader)
"Open the pod bay doors, HAL." -- Dave Bowman, 2001