Right. Because he is going to stash it under a mattress in his house, leading him to need a new, large house, for that said mattress, so he bought a large house for it, right?

Are you really that stupid to think that someone with $2.5 billion is not going to invest their money and get better returns than most of us would? Do you really think they will hide the money under the mattress so that it will only earn 0% interest?

Anyone running a network of any significant size should have their own time servers. Anyone running Active Directory should have their own time servers.

So, it *is* reasonable to firewall that off in a network of any significant size.

damn. I wish I hadn't commented so that I can +karma you!! :)

75mil is how much of 2.5bil again? 3%. Much less than the 25% you are wasting.

The African billions were spent on despots and corruption with very little trickle down effect.

Please don't try to make sense on the Internet. These people are just jealous.

Just updated my Macs.

How is this relevant to protecting someone's SSN on the network via air-gapping?

That is completely different from air gapping any SSN type information. Nobody disagrees that you should only be professional in your conduct at work.

Oh, if it's not air gapping, then it must be placed out on the public internet? Are you a fucking moron or do you just play one on slashdot?

Seriously? Keeping your personnel files on paper and not the computer? And you think getting checks is slow now? BWAHAHAHAHA

Which is why it is interesting the WD drives transfer 1TB more than the Seagates.

Someone else pointed out that 360K was double sided double density disks, so yours probably was before that. I think that was the 90K single sided single density disks (the Apple ][s were superior during that time, being capable of 140K... :P :P Though, sadly, they never got to double density drives)

Seeing that the specific Seagate model they used have 128MB cache and the WD model had 64MB cache, I'm not sure how more cache makes it slower.