Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment TL;DR: [Citation Needed] (Score 1) 410

Verizon is crippling Youtube bandwidth on FIOS.

Verizon is guilty of extortion. They are holding the user hostage, and forcing google to pay up to protect their brand.

Meanwhile, the FIOS subscriber, such as myself, finally have an answer as to why Youtube hasnt fucking worked for a year now.

Verizon FIOS... has just lost its sainthood.

If you value youtube, and use it... Do not subscribe to Verizon FIOS.

Is this true? Can somebody verify this?

I am currently a FiOS subscriber, and I too have had significant bandwidth and buffer issues, particularly in HD, even at the mere 720p level. The 1080p level is outright unusable. Which never made any sense to me, given the bandwidth numbers that I'm allegedly paying for.

I'll be canceling my FiOS subscription immediately if this is true.

Comment It'll Pass. Flawlessly. (Score 1) 212

As always, 98% of people won't have a clue what it does or how it works, and will install it because someone tells them to.

After that, it's wide acceptance will be cited as a justification for it's existence.

Jeez. Sounds like a certain operating system I know.

Comment Re:What the hell happened inside Google? (Score 4, Interesting) 410

At one point, there was an article, titled "Facebook Wants To Be Your One True Login". It, at one point, became the top Google search result for: "facebook login", thus changing the behavior of Firefox's Awesomebar for the command: "facebook login". The article is here. Skip directly to the comments.

Comment Re:Government exists for warfare. (Score 1) 247

2/3rds of people who have and use an internet connection. Children don't count, people without their own internet access don't count.

Of course, the only people with a reasonable opinion about how governments should operate on the internet are the selfsame people who haven't had their worldview tarnished by an internet connection.

And children.

Comment Re:Microsoft's TrueSkill beat Elo before this comp (Score 3, Informative) 133

Not to belittle what Microsoft did, but in the interest if giving credit where credit is due:

Here’s the problem with Battle.net 2.0: 2002s Warcraft III: Reign of Chaos is one of the most underrated video games ever created. And that’s before you learn its online apparatus is the foundation for modern matchmaking, where Blizzard Entertainment should get royalties every time you brag about your X-Box Live Trueskill rating. (Then again, I shouldn’t be giving Blizzard ideas right now.)

Here’s how Warcraft III matchmaking worked: Everyone starts at level one. The maximum level is fifty. You play players within six levels of your own. Win five games, gain a level. Lose five games, lose a level. The penalty for losing is reduced during levels one to nine. Thus, players who win half their games will become level ten.

It was simple and transparent. That was the hook, and people choked on it. It turned Warcraft III ladder play into what ICCUP serves for Starcraft players, a stomping ground so competitive that climbing the food chain gave you a shot at the guys who played for a living. That’s what a good online gaming system does.

The quote comes from Battle.net 2.0: The Antithesis of Consumer Confidence. I would encourage you to read the entire thing, but for reasons completely unrelated to this thread.

Slashdot Top Deals

Trying to be happy is like trying to build a machine for which the only specification is that it should run noiselessly.

Working...