While I do see your point with that satire(and it is a good one!), what's wrong with asking? A professional should be able to tell what he needs to do without asking, sure, but I respect the professional who both knows, and asks to check himself/find better ideas.

Actually, he mentioned the two possible origins of the universe in a rather interesting way. Either

A) The universe existed infinitely and never began(sound familiar?), or

B) Must have been created at some point, by something, someone, or... itself, which seems to be a logical paradox.

Brasil - Bump Bump Bump? I'll watch that.

Or brilliant.
...I'm kidding, I see your point.

I prefer political assailants over people who exaggerate to enforce a weak point. Let's be straight though. This isn't an attack. A sneaky(also clever) campaign, for sure, and I'm sure it caused some emotional distress. But there was no physical harm, no substantial mental scarring or emotional hurt. If this ingenious and devious advertisement is to be called an attack, it was a harmless one.

But then it would be too easy for them to infect Madagascar!

Mach 20 whoosh.

Interestingly, I do as well. I had no idea that they even deleted accounts for that reason.

Some of you probably won't get that - Americans call it "counterclockwise".

Clockwise if you're American, anticlockwise if not.

Probably end up killing marine life and stopping waves from happening

You're right, those things might actually happen!

Currently, the Department of Energy has a mandate to spend $50 million a year on backing such research

Oh, so they're doing research to the tune of 50 mil before they try anything big. Problem solved.

have no interest in rewarding a monopoly while I still have a alternatives

I, however, am highly entertained by paradoxes.

Couldn't recent levels of hacking or hacking reports be due to upgraded hacking rather than downgraded security? Maybe I'm wrong, I'm not in the industry, but that seems like basic logic - after Anon, everyone started jumping on the bandwagon. No?

Christian here. I'm answering on the basis that your question is "If humans were created not evolved into, then how do you explain this obvious evolution in humans?" I'd say... I'm no biologist, mechanical is more my thing. You tell me.

While you have a legitimate argument that I agree with, you also have to consider the reasoning behind such a wide range of laws - the sheer number of ways that people skirt the law did a good job of forcing a new law into existence to(try to) prevent it. I think that the various laws people are now complaining about are likely useful to the general populace in original intent, but have since degraded or been abused into something that people see in a bad light(and with reason). Am I wrong?